Salesforce Exam B2B-Solution-Architect Topic 1 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2B-Solution-Architect exam

Question #: 32
Topic #: 1

Universal Containers (UC) has expanded rapidly in recent yean following a number of acquisitions. The new CMO wants to use all Leads from one of the acquired Salesforce orgs to luck-start a new targeted campaign in uC's mam Salesforce org. The acquired company would like to keep its Lead data because it enriches the Lead before it comes into Salesforce via third-party marketing tool and supports its direct sales channel. Beyond the Lead use case, both Salesforce orgs will remain completely independent from one another.

Which integration approach should a Solution Architect recommend between the UC mam org (the target org) and the acquired org (the source org)?

ADiscuss a strategy that includes manually migrating all Leads from the sourceorg to the target org every day using data loader.

BDiscuss a strategy between the source org and target org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrate Leads to the target org before the enrichmentwithin the source org.

CDiscuss long-term strategies around deprecating the source org's ability to collect and enrich Lead data, and start to direct all Leads to the target org and ignore the source org.

DDiscuss a strategy between the source org andtarget org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrate Leads to the target org after they are enriched in the source org.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

Option D would involve discussing a strategy between the source organd target org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrating Leads to the target org after they are enriched in the source org. This would allow both Salesforce orgs to remain independent from each other, while also enabling UC to use all Leads from one of the acquired Salesforce orgs for its new targeted campaign. This would also preserve the value of Lead enrichment that happens in the source org via third-party marketing tool.

https://trailhead.salesforce.com/credentials/b2bsolutionarchitect

by Demetra at May 08, 2024, 07:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium B2B-Solution-Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jerry

2 months ago

I'm torn between Options B and D. Maybe they could do a little dance between the two orgs, like a Salesforce tango, to get the Leads flowing just right.

upvoted 0 times

Chuck

2 months ago

Maybe a combination of Options B and D could work, ensuring Leads are migrated at the right time for enrichment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nada

2 months ago

I agree, Option B seems like a strategic approach to ensure the Leads are migrated effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Refugia

2 months ago

Option B sounds like a good compromise. It allows for collaboration between the two orgs' Sales teams.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

3 months ago

Option A is just plain lazy. Manually migrating Leads every day? Ain't nobody got time for that! Where's the automation, people?

upvoted 0 times

Shaun

2 months ago

C) Discuss long-term strategies around deprecating the source org's ability to collect and enrich Lead data, and start to direct all Leads to the target org and ignore the source org.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crissy

2 months ago

B) Discuss a strategy between the source org and target org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrate Leads to the target org before the enrichment within the source org.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominic

2 months ago

C) Discuss long-term strategies around deprecating the source org's ability to collect and enrich Lead data, and start to direct all Leads to the target org and ignore the source org.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearline

2 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Alonso

3 months ago

Agreed. Option C seems like a long-term fix but might disrupt current workflows too much.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leontine

3 months ago

Option C is a bit extreme, don't you think? Deprecating the source org's ability to collect and enrich Leads? That's like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

3 months ago

I think Option B is worth considering too. Collaborating with the sales teams to define the criteria for Lead migration could help both orgs get value from the data.

upvoted 0 times

Louvenia

3 months ago

I agree. It's important to define the criteria for Lead migration to maximize the value of the data for both orgs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gussie

3 months ago

Option B sounds like a good idea. Collaborating with the sales teams could ensure a smooth migration process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

3 months ago

True, post-enrichment sounds better. Keeps source org's value intact.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

3 months ago

Exactly, might miss valuable data if done before enrichment. Feels incomplete.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

3 months ago

But what about B? It suggests migrating before enrichment. Missing any value?

upvoted 0 times

...

Demetra

3 months ago

Option D makes the most sense. Migrating the Leads after they're enriched in the source org ensures that UC gets the highest quality data for their new campaign.

upvoted 0 times