BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam B2B Solution Architect Topic 1 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2B Solution Architect exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 1
[All B2B Solution Architect Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) has expanded rapidly in recent yean following a number of acquisitions. The new CMO wants to use all Leads from one of the acquired Salesforce orgs to luck-start a new targeted campaign in uC's mam Salesforce org. The acquired company would like to keep its Lead data because it enriches the Lead before it comes into Salesforce via third-party marketing tool and supports its direct sales channel. Beyond the Lead use case, both Salesforce orgs will remain completely independent from one another.

Which integration approach should a Solution Architect recommend between the UC mam org (the target org) and the acquired org (the source org)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Option D would involve discussing a strategy between the source organd target org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrating Leads to the target org after they are enriched in the source org. This would allow both Salesforce orgs to remain independent from each other, while also enabling UC to use all Leads from one of the acquired Salesforce orgs for its new targeted campaign. This would also preserve the value of Lead enrichment that happens in the source org via third-party marketing tool.

https://trailhead.salesforce.com/credentials/b2bsolutionarchitect


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jerry
5 months ago
I'm torn between Options B and D. Maybe they could do a little dance between the two orgs, like a Salesforce tango, to get the Leads flowing just right.
upvoted 0 times
Chuck
4 months ago
Maybe a combination of Options B and D could work, ensuring Leads are migrated at the right time for enrichment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
4 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like a strategic approach to ensure the Leads are migrated effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
5 months ago
Option B sounds like a good compromise. It allows for collaboration between the two orgs' Sales teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delsie
5 months ago
Option A is just plain lazy. Manually migrating Leads every day? Ain't nobody got time for that! Where's the automation, people?
upvoted 0 times
Shaun
4 months ago
C) Discuss long-term strategies around deprecating the source org's ability to collect and enrich Lead data, and start to direct all Leads to the target org and ignore the source org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
4 months ago
B) Discuss a strategy between the source org and target org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrate Leads to the target org before the enrichment within the source org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
5 months ago
C) Discuss long-term strategies around deprecating the source org's ability to collect and enrich Lead data, and start to direct all Leads to the target org and ignore the source org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
5 months ago
B) Discuss a strategy between the source org and target org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrate Leads to the target org before the enrichment within the source org.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alonso
6 months ago
Agreed. Option C seems like a long-term fix but might disrupt current workflows too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
6 months ago
Option C is a bit extreme, don't you think? Deprecating the source org's ability to collect and enrich Leads? That's like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
6 months ago
I think Option B is worth considering too. Collaborating with the sales teams to define the criteria for Lead migration could help both orgs get value from the data.
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
5 months ago
I agree. It's important to define the criteria for Lead migration to maximize the value of the data for both orgs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
5 months ago
Option B sounds like a good idea. Collaborating with the sales teams could ensure a smooth migration process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
6 months ago
True, post-enrichment sounds better. Keeps source org's value intact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
6 months ago
Exactly, might miss valuable data if done before enrichment. Feels incomplete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
6 months ago
But what about B? It suggests migrating before enrichment. Missing any value?
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
6 months ago
Option D makes the most sense. Migrating the Leads after they're enriched in the source org ensures that UC gets the highest quality data for their new campaign.
upvoted 0 times
Idella
4 months ago
F: Communication between the orgs will be key for a successful integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
5 months ago
E: Let's make sure the Sales teams are aligned on the criteria for migrating Leads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
5 months ago
D: This approach will definitely benefit UC in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
5 months ago
C: It's important to prioritize quality data for the targeted campaign.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
5 months ago
B: I agree, migrating the Leads after they're enriched makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
5 months ago
A: Option D is definitely the way to go. It ensures the highest quality data for the new campaign.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
6 months ago
Yeah, I think D is the most logical one. We want enriched leads in the target org, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
6 months ago
This question feels confusing. So many options.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel