BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam ARC-801 Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ARC-801 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 2
[All ARC-801 Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) is a global organisation that wants to establish a 628 Commerce site to meet changing customer expectationsand expand into new markets. These expectations include being able to self-serve 24x7 and get automated updates on orders. There are existing sales channels used at UC. Including a standard Sales team as well as a partner sales channel.

The sales leader met with a Solution Architect and shared that they want to grow their digital capabilities over the next 2 years. Time is of the essence and the sales leader needs to have the ecommerce solution in place as soon as possible to capture market share in new geographies before other competitors move in. The executive team has promised prompt access to key stakeholders as needed.

What is the appropriate next step 'or the Solution Architect?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

An iterative rollout strategy, starting with B2B Commerce in a new geography, allows Universal Containers to quickly establish a digital presence and capture market share, addressing the urgency conveyed by the sales leader. This phased approach ensures a focused and manageable implementation, providing immediate value and learning from the initial launch to inform subsequent phases. It aligns with Salesforce's recommendations for adopting a scalable and adaptable implementation strategy, particularly for complex, multi-cloud solutions in dynamic market conditions.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Davida
25 days ago
Ooh, this is a tough one! I'm torn between options B and D. Maybe the Solution Architect should just flip a coin and let fate decide. Or, they could just ask the Magic 8-Ball for guidance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
29 days ago
This question is a real head-scratcher! I feel like I need a crystal ball to predict the future and select the best option. Maybe the Solution Architect should just roll dice to decide?
upvoted 0 times
Cory
3 days ago
B) Propose a set of high-level design options with architecture diagrams depicting the potential elements of a solution that would meet the needs of the enterprise, including pros and cons to help the stakeholders make final decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
14 days ago
A) Propose the introduction of B2B Commerce and CPQ to address the key areas of need such as global commerce, complex pricing, quoting and discounting needs; highlight the key features and the alignment of the features to the needs outlined.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenny
1 months ago
Personally, I'm leaning towards option A. Proposing the B2B Commerce and CPQ solution and highlighting its key features will demonstrate the value it can bring to UC.
upvoted 0 times
Alva
12 days ago
A) It's important to clearly demonstrate how this solution can improve efficiency and drive revenue growth for UC in the long term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
14 days ago
B) I agree, showcasing the specific benefits of B2B Commerce and CPQ will help the stakeholders understand how it can meet UC's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
23 days ago
A) Propose the introduction of B2B Commerce and CPQ to address the key areas of need such as global commerce, complex pricing, quoting and discounting needs; highlight the key features and the alignment of the features to the needs outlined.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Van
1 months ago
I'm gonna go with option C. An iterative rollout strategy will allow UC to secure a first-mover advantage in a new geography while gradually expanding the solution to other areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
1 months ago
Option D sounds like the most prudent approach. Gathering requirements from various stakeholders first will ensure that the recommended solution addresses all the needs.
upvoted 0 times
Whitney
18 days ago
D) Recommend discovery meetings with additional stakeholders to gather information on the functional and technical requirement across the sales and other functional areas, then provide a recommendation based on information gathered to deliver an MVP.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buddy
1 months ago
I think proposing a set of high-level design options with architecture diagrams would also be a good approach. It will help stakeholders make informed decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
1 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Proposing high-level design options with pros and cons will give the stakeholders a clear picture of the potential solutions and help them make an informed decision.
upvoted 0 times
Winfred
23 days ago
D) Recommend discovery meetings with additional stakeholders to gather information on the functional and technical requirements across the sales and other functional areas, then provide a recommendation based on information gathered to deliver an MVP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
1 months ago
A) Propose the introduction of B2B Commerce and CPQ to address the key areas of need such as global commerce, complex pricing, quoting and discounting needs; highlight the key features and the alignment of the features to the needs outlined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
1 months ago
B) Propose a set of high-level design options with architecture diagrams depicting the potential elements of a solution that would meet the needs of the enterprise, including pros and cons to help the stakeholders make final decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Magdalene
2 months ago
I agree with Hyun. Highlighting the key features and aligning them to the needs outlined will help address the key areas of need for UC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
2 months ago
I think the appropriate next step for the Solution Architect is to propose the introduction of B2B Commerce and CPQ.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel