Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam ANC-301 Topic 6 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-301 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 6
[All ANC-301 Questions]

Universal Containers' CRM Analytics team is building a dashboard with two widgets, and the queries use different datasets.

1. List widget associated to the query "Type_2" and grouped by the dimension "Type" (multi-selection)

2. Donut chart widget associated to the query "Query_pie_3" and grouped by the dimension "Type"

The team wants any selection in the List widget to filter the Donut chart and vice vers

a. Users should be able to choose more than one Type (multi-selection).

What is the recommended way to accomplish the required filtering?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Phyliss
2 months ago
C, no doubt about it. Anything less and those widgets are gonna be as useful as a chocolate teapot. Gotta get that two-way filtering working, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I'm tempted to go with B, but I have a feeling C is the way to go. Gotta love these tricky CRM Analytics exams!
upvoted 0 times
Na
17 days ago
That's a good point, but I still think setting up interactions for each query is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
23 days ago
But wouldn't using 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
24 days ago
I agree, setting up interactions for each query seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
26 days ago
I think C is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queenie
2 months ago
Ah, the ol' 'filter the filters' question. Classic CRM Analytics stuff. I'd go with C, it's the only one that mentions 'selection based interaction' which is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
2 months ago
I'm not too sure about this one. B sounds like it might work, but I feel like C is the more comprehensive solution. Guess I'll have to double-check the documentation.
upvoted 0 times
Jacquelyne
1 months ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
1 months ago
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply It to the query of 'Query ple 3'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
1 months ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margart
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. Setting up a result and selection based interaction for each query seems like the way to go to make the widgets filter each other.
upvoted 0 times
Brandee
2 months ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
2 months ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrie
2 months ago
I think setting up a result and selection based interaction for each query would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe creating a selection based Interaction and applying it to the query of 'Query_pie_3' is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
3 months ago
I think the recommended way is to use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel