Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam ANC-201 Topic 6 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-201 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 6
[All ANC-201 Questions]

Universal Containers' CRM Analytics team is building a dashboard with two widgets, and the queries use different datasets.

1. List widget associated to the query "Type_2" and grouped by the dimension "Type" (multi-selection)

2. Donut chart widget associated to the query "Query_pie_3" and grouped by the dimension "Type"

The team wants any selection in the List widget to filter the Donut chart and vice vers

a. Users should be able to choose more than one Type (multi-selection).

What is the recommended way to accomplish the required filtering?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Keva
2 months ago
I wonder if the 'Type' dimension is just a fancy way of saying 'flavor'. Maybe they're building a dashboard for an ice cream shop?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
2 months ago
Option B sounds good, but I'm a bit concerned about the typo in the question. Is it 'Query_pie_3' or 'Query_ple_3'? I hope it's not a trick question!
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
21 days ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
24 days ago
B) Option B sounds good, but I'm a bit concerned about the typo in the question. Is it 'Query_pie_3' or 'Query_ple_3'? I hope it's not a trick question!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
1 months ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
2 months ago
I think setting up a result and selection based interaction for each query might be too complex for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
2 months ago
Why not go for option A? Connecting the data sources seems like the most logical choice to me. I'd rather not overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
2 months ago
Option C seems like the most comprehensive approach. Setting up interactions for both queries will ensure a seamless filtering experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
2 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. It's a straightforward solution that will get the job done.
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
24 days ago
C) Set up a result and selection based interaction for each query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
29 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the most efficient way to achieve the required filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 months ago
B) Create a selection based Interaction and apply it to the query of 'Query_pie_3'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 months ago
A) Use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields from the two datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dwight
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but creating a selection based Interaction and applying it to the query of 'Query_pie_3' could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
2 months ago
I agree with Merissa, that seems like the most efficient way to accomplish the required filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
3 months ago
I think the recommended way is to use 'Connect Data Sources' to create a mapping of the two fields.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel