You are using replace inbox message feature. But your audience has changed and some of the contacts who received the first message do not exist. What would happen?
Option D is the way to go, folks. Gotta keep the living updated and let the dead stay in peace. Unless, of course, you're running a ghostly communication service. Then option C might be more fitting!
D is the clear winner here. You need to update the message for the existing users and delete it for the ones who no longer exist. Otherwise, you might end up sending messages to the Bermuda Triangle of email accounts.
C is the way to go! If the message has already been read, then replacing it wouldn't make much sense. Gotta keep the audience informed, even if some of them have moved on to the afterlife.
I'm going with B. It makes sense to only replace the message for the users who no longer exist. That way, the rest of the audience still gets the updated information.
I'm going with B. It makes sense to only replace the message for the users who no longer exist. That way, the rest of the audience still gets the updated information.
Hmm, option D seems the most logical choice. You wouldn't want to replace the message for users who no longer exist. That would be like trying to send a letter to a ghost address!
I'm leaning towards option D as well. It makes the most sense to handle the non-existent users properly, while still updating the message for the existing ones. Gotta cover all the bases, you know?
Ha, this question is a real head-scratcher. Maybe the developer who wrote this 'replace inbox message' feature was having a bad day and just didn't think it through properly. Option A sounds like the lazy way out.
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C about only replacing for users who read the first message seems a bit weird to me. Why would that be the behavior? Seems like an odd edge case.
I disagree, I think option D is the correct answer. It's important to handle the non-existent users properly, you can't just leave the old message there for them. Deleting it is the right thing to do.
Option B seems the most straightforward to me. If some contacts no longer exist, it makes sense that the message would only be replaced for those users. Replacing it for everyone seems overkill.
This is a tricky question. I'm not sure about the exact behavior of the 'replace inbox message' feature. I'm leaning towards option D, as it seems the most logical - replace the message for existing users and delete it for those who don't exist. But I'm not 100% confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Margurite
5 months agoTamekia
4 months agoGerman
5 months agoArlette
6 months agoHeike
5 months agoMarsha
5 months agoHermila
6 months agoCasandra
6 months agoDong
5 months agoBelen
5 months agoMartha
5 months agoLindsey
6 months agoPamela
6 months agoMicaela
6 months agoTammy
6 months agoLevi
5 months agoTu
6 months agoHelga
6 months agoUna
6 months agoRikki
6 months agoCherelle
6 months agoRenay
6 months agoOdelia
6 months agoTennie
7 months agoBernardine
7 months agoDorinda
7 months agoLenna
7 months agoOdelia
7 months agoArlette
8 months agoMaurine
8 months agoShenika
8 months agoLili
8 months agoAmie
7 months agoLorriane
7 months agoAlayna
8 months agoKristal
8 months ago