BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SailPoint Exam IdentityIQ-Engineer Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for SailPoint's IdentityIQ-Engineer exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 2
[All IdentityIQ-Engineer Questions]

The engineer is configuring a new application definition.

The customer wants an Audit record to be created with the error message, if provisioning fails.

Is this the rule an engineer should write to accomplish the goal?

Solution: Write an AfterProvisioning rule.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

An AfterProvisioning rule in SailPoint IdentityIQ is typically used to execute custom logic after the provisioning process has been completed successfully. However, if provisioning fails, this rule will not be triggered because it is specifically designed for post-successful provisioning activities. To log an error message in the audit record when provisioning fails, a better approach would be to use a provisioning error handler or configure a specific workflow that captures errors and logs them accordingly. The AfterProvisioning rule is not the correct solution for this use case. Refer to the SailPoint IdentityIQ Provisioning and Workflow documentation for appropriate methods of handling provisioning errors and audit logging.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Goldie
2 months ago
AfterProvisioning? Nah, that's like trying to fix a flat tire after the car's already in the ditch. 'ProvisioningFailureLogger' is where it's at!
upvoted 0 times
Leigha
19 days ago
Engineer: Let's go with ProvisioningFailureLogger then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
1 months ago
Customer: No, ProvisioningFailureLogger is better for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
1 months ago
Engineer: AfterProvisioning rule is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
France
2 months ago
In that case, the engineer should consider adding additional error handling logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
2 months ago
But what if the provisioning fails before the AfterProvisioning rule is executed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
2 months ago
I agree with Keshia, that rule should create an Audit record with the error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
2 months ago
I think the engineer should write an AfterProvisioning rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced. Shouldn't we be using the 'ProvisioningErrorHandler' rule instead? Seems more appropriate for handling errors.
upvoted 0 times
Ty
2 months ago
Customer: No, I think the ProvisioningErrorHandler rule would be more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
2 months ago
Engineer: Yes, an AfterProvisioning rule should be written.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrine
3 months ago
No way, that's not the right rule. I'd go with the 'AfterProvisioningFailure' rule, much more specific to the task at hand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
3 months ago
I agree, AfterProvisioning is the way to go. Gotta love those error messages, they're like the spice of life in IT!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
3 months ago
Yes, the AfterProvisioning rule is the right approach to create an Audit record on a provisioning failure. Seems straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
Leah
2 months ago
AfterProvisioning rule is the way to go
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
2 months ago
Customer: Agreed, it will help track any issues that may arise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
2 months ago
That makes sense
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
2 months ago
Engineer: It's important to have that in place for auditing purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
2 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
2 months ago
Customer: Seems straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
3 months ago
Engineer: Yes, the AfterProvisioning rule is the right approach to create an Audit record on a provisioning failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel