Qlik QSDA2024 Exam Questions

In this scenario, the data architect needs to replace the SupplierID in the Orders table with the corresponding SupplierName from the Suppliers table, and the desired output should be a single table that includes all the order details along with the SupplierName instead of the SupplierID.

Analyzing the Options:

Option A:

Uses a MAPPING LOAD followed by an APPLYMAP to replace SupplierID with SupplierName in the Orders table. However, the table is dropped afterward, which means it won't produce the required output.

The MAPPING LOAD approach is generally used to map values but is not necessary in this context as we are combining data from two tables directly.

Option B:

This option attempts to LEFT JOIN the Products table with the Suppliers table, but it does not directly address replacing SupplierID with SupplierName in the Orders table.

Additionally, it does not remove the SupplierID after the join, which is essential for the correct output.

Option C:

This option uses a LEFT JOIN with the DISTINCT keyword on the SupplierID field to avoid duplicates. The SupplierName is correctly joined to the Orders table, replacing the SupplierID.

This approach is the most appropriate because it results in a single table containing all order details with the SupplierName instead of the SupplierID.

Option D:

Similar to Option A, but it also introduces an unnecessary renaming step with MAPPING LOAD. It's redundant and does not improve the solution over Option C.

Correct Script Choice:

Option C is the correct script because:

It ensures that SupplierName replaces SupplierID in the Orders table using a LEFT JOIN.

The DISTINCT keyword is applied to the SupplierID field to prevent duplicate rows during the join.

The result is a single table containing the required information with SupplierName in place of SupplierID.

Qlik Sense Join Operations: Using the correct JOIN type and ensuring proper deduplication (with DISTINCT if necessary) is key to merging tables in Qlik Sense.

In this scenario, users of a published app report incomplete visualizations, but the data architect is unable to replicate the error. This issue affects only one team, suggesting that the problem is related to how data is being restricted or filtered for that specific team.

Section Access: This is a security feature in Qlik Sense that controls user access to specific data within an app. If Section Access is misconfigured, it can restrict access to more records than intended, leading to incomplete visualizations for certain users or teams.

Restricting Too Many Records: If the Section Access is too restrictive, it might limit the data available to the affected users, causing the visualizations to display incomplete information. This could explain why the data architect, who likely has full access, cannot replicate the issue.

The given Excel spreadsheet has a Region field where the region value is only specified for the first record within each region. The data architect needs to fill in the missing region values for subsequent rows.

Previous() Function: The Previous() function in Qlik Sense returns the value of the expression from the previous row. In this case, it can be used to fill down the Region values so that each row contains the correct region information.

Implementation: The script can be designed to check if the current row's Region value is missing (null). If it is missing, the script can assign the value from the previous row using the Previous() function.

LOAD

If(IsNull(Region), Previous(Region), Region) AS Region,

...

This logic fills in the missing Region values with the value from the preceding row, which effectively resolves the issue shown in the spreadsheet.

In the provided scenario, the goal is to export tables from a Qlik Sense model based on rules specified in an external text file. The structure of the text file indicates which table to export, the filename to use, and how many copies to create.

Given this structure, the data architect needs to:

Loop through each row in the text file to process each table.

Use an IF statement to check whether the specified table exists in the model (though it's mentioned they are verified to exist, this step may involve conditional logic to ensure the rules are correctly followed).

Use another IF statement to handle the creation of multiple copies, ensuring each file is named incrementally (e.g., Clients1.qvd, Clients2.qvd, etc.).

Key Script Strategies:

Loop: A loop is necessary to iterate through each row of the text file to process the tables specified for export.

IF Statements: The first IF statement checks conditions such as whether the table should be exported (based on additional logic if needed). The second IF statement handles the creation of multiple copies by incrementing the filename.

This approach covers all the necessary logic with the minimum set of scripting strategies, ensuring that each table is exported according to the rules defined.

When dealing with a database that is continuously updated with new records, updates, and deletions, an efficient data load strategy is necessary to minimize the load time and keep the Qlik Sense data model up-to-date.

Explanation of Steps:

Load the existing data from the QVD:

This step retrieves the already loaded and processed data from a previous session. It acts as a base to which new or updated records will be added.

Load new and updated data from the database. Concatenate with the table loaded from the QVD:

The next step is to load only the new and updated records from the database. This minimizes the amount of data being loaded and focuses on just the changes.

The new and updated records are then concatenated with the existing data from the QVD, creating a combined dataset that includes all relevant information.

Create a separate table for the deleted rows and use a WHERE NOT EXISTS to remove these records:

A separate table is created to handle deletions. The WHERE NOT EXISTS clause is used to identify and remove records from the combined dataset that have been deleted in the source database.