The human resources department needs to see a distribution of salaries broken down by department with standard deviation indicators.
Which visualization should the developer use?
A box plot is the best visualization for displaying the distribution of salaries broken down by department with standard deviation indicators. Box plots show the spread of data, including key measures like quartiles, median, and outliers, which are useful for analyzing salary distributions. They also naturally incorporate standard deviation indicators through the spread of data.
Key Concepts:
Box Plot: This type of chart is designed for analyzing the distribution of data across different categories (in this case, departments). It shows the spread and variability of data, which can include standard deviations.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . Distribution plot: While a distribution plot can show spread, it's not as effective for showing standard deviation and is less suited for categorical breakdowns.
C . Histogram: A histogram shows the distribution of a single variable, but it doesn't provide the same detailed breakdown as a box plot.
D . Scatter plot: Scatter plots are used for showing relationships between two variables and are not suitable for showing standard deviation across departments.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Box Plot for Distribution Analysis: Box plots are ideal for visualizing data distribution and variability across categories, making them the preferred choice for analyzing salary distribution by department.
Thus, the box plot is the best choice for visualizing salary distribution with standard deviation indicators, making B the verified answer.
An app needs to load a few hundred rows of data from a .csv text file. The file is the result of a concatenated data dump by multiple divisions across several countries. These divisions use different internal systems and processes, which causes country names to appear differently. For example, the United States of America appears in several places as 'USA', 'U.S.A.', or 'US'.
For the country dimension to work properly in the app, the naming of countries must be standardized in the data model.
Which action should the business analyst complete to address this issue?
In Qlik Sense, when dealing with inconsistent naming conventions across different systems or divisions (like the variation in country names), the best practice is to standardize the data during the loading process. Using a lookup table is the most efficient approach to achieve this. This involves loading a separate table that contains all variations of a country name along with the standardized version. During the load process, Qlik Sense can then map the varying names to a common value.
Key Concepts:
Lookup Table: A lookup table contains key-value pairs where different versions of a data element (like country names) are mapped to a single standard value. In this case, the lookup table could have entries like USA, U.S.A., US all mapped to United States of America.
Data Standardization: This is crucial in ensuring consistent analysis across datasets. By converting variations of country names into a single consistent value, the business analyst ensures that all data visualizations and analysis will treat 'USA', 'US', etc., as the same entity.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . Create a calculated master dimension expression: While this could theoretically work by creating a calculated expression to handle variations, it's not scalable or maintainable, especially as new variations in country names could appear in future data loads.
C . Cleanse the source text file prior to loading: This option would require modifying the raw data files manually, which is time-consuming and not sustainable if data is frequently updated or if the number of variations is extensive.
D . Use the Replace option in Data manager: The Replace option in the Data Manager could work on a small scale, but it requires manual intervention each time, which is not efficient or sustainable when new data is loaded. Also, it's more useful for one-off corrections than for handling systemic issues across multiple data loads.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Data Modeling Best Practices: Lookup tables are a common approach to resolve issues of inconsistent data across multiple sources. They ensure that data is consistently represented in visualizations and reduce the need for manual intervention.
Data Cleansing During Loading: Qlik Sense allows for transformation and data cleansing during the data load process. A lookup table is part of this capability and ensures that the data loaded into the app is clean and consistent.
Using a lookup table is the most scalable and maintainable approach to standardizing country names in this scenario, which is why option B is the verified solution.
A business analyst has access to all of a company's data for the past 10 years. The source table consists of the following fields: TransactionID, TransactionTime, Transaction Date, Transaction Year, Cardholder, Cardholder address, Cardissuer, and Amount.
Users request to create an app based on this source with the following requirements:
* Users only review the data for the past 2 years
* Data must be updated daily
* Users should not view cardholder info
Which steps should the business analyst complete to improve the app performance?
The business analyst needs to optimize the app for performance and ensure that users only see data from the past two years, without cardholder information, and that the data is updated daily. By deselecting the Cardholder and time fields in the Data Manager, the analyst ensures that sensitive information is not loaded. Applying a filter to extract data based on transaction year ensures that only relevant data (the last two years) is included in the app, improving performance. Lastly, requesting a daily reload task from the system administrator ensures that the app stays up to date.
Key Concepts:
Deselecting Fields: This removes unnecessary fields, such as Cardholder information, from the data model, which improves performance and ensures privacy.
Filtering Data: Applying a filter to limit data to the last two years reduces the dataset size and improves app responsiveness.
Daily Reload Task: Requesting a daily reload ensures that the app's data stays current, meeting the requirement for daily updates.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . Delete Cardholder and time fields, use bookmark: A bookmark is not an efficient solution for filtering by transaction year.
B . Set analysis and API reload: Set analysis works within the app but does not optimize the data load itself. Using an API for reload tasks is unnecessarily complex.
C . Use filter pane and auto-calendar: While auto-calendar fields can be useful, they don't optimize the data loading process for performance.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Efficient Data Loading: Qlik Sense recommends filtering data at the load stage to improve performance, especially when dealing with large datasets.
Thus, D is the correct solution, making it the verified answer.
A clothing manufacturer has operations throughout Europe and needs to manage access to the data.
There is data for the following countries under the field SACOUNTRY -> France, Spain, United Kingdom and Germany. The application has been designed with Section Access to manage the data displayed.
What is the expected outcome of this Section Access table?
In this Section Access script, the roles and access to data for different users are defined based on the SACOUNTRY field. Here's how the data access will work:
ADMIN: The ADMIN user has access to all data because the * in the SACOUNTRY field allows full access to all countries in the dataset.
USER1: This user has access to Spain and France because the SACOUNTRY field specifies these countries for USER1.
USER2: This user has access to United Kingdom because the SACOUNTRY field specifies only the UK for USER2.
Key Concepts:
Section Access: This feature in Qlik Sense controls which data users can see based on their login credentials. The access rights are controlled through fields like ACCESS, USERID, and SACOUNTRY in this case.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
B and C: These suggest that users won't see data they have access to, which contradicts the defined Section Access script.
D: This incorrectly assumes that ADMIN cannot see Germany, which is not defined in the script.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Section Access Best Practices: In Qlik Sense, Section Access tables define the data that users can see, and the use of * for the ADMIN role ensures access to all data.
Thus, A is the correct answer because it matches the expected data access behavior based on the script, making it the verified answer.
Exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit.
An app is being developed at a university to monitor student exam attempts- Three core tables are loaded into the app for Students, Exams, and Attempts. Students can attempt the same exam multiple times.
Before building any visualizations, the business analyst needs to know:
* How many students are in the system
* What percentage of students have not yet attempted an exam
Which metadata should the analyst focus on to answer these questions?
To answer the two questions:
How many students are in the system?
What percentage of students have not yet attempted an exam?
The analyst needs to focus on the StudentID field, specifically in relation to the Attempts table. This is because the Attempts table captures all exam attempts made by students, and we can deduce which students have and have not made an attempt by examining the presence of StudentID values in this table.
Key Concepts:
Total Distinct Values: This provides the total number of unique students who have attempted exams. It helps identify how many students have made at least one attempt.
Subset Ratio: This compares the values of StudentID between the Students table and the Attempts table. The subset ratio shows how many students in the Students table are represented in the Attempts table. This ratio helps determine the percentage of students who have not yet attempted any exams.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
B . Non-null values and Subset ratio for the StudentID field in the Students table: The non-null values in the Students table are not relevant to the question about exam attempts. The focus should be on whether the StudentID is present in the Attempts table.
C . Subset ratio and Present distinct values for the ExamID field in the Attempts table: This focuses on exams, not students. The question specifically relates to how many students have attempted exams.
D . Present distinct values and Density% for the ExamID field in the Exams table: This focuses on the number of exams and their density, which does not help in determining how many students have attempted or not attempted an exam.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Subset Ratio and Distinct Counts: Qlik Sense's data model viewer provides valuable metadata like the distinct count of a field and its subset ratio when compared to related fields in other tables. This is particularly useful for understanding relationships and gaps in the data, such as identifying students who have not yet made an exam attempt.
By focusing on the Total distinct values and Subset ratio for the StudentID field in the Attempts table, the business analyst can easily determine the total number of students and the percentage who have not yet attempted an exam, making A the verified answer.
Matthew
2 days agoJani
22 days agoNgoc
23 days agoYasuko
1 months agoTy
2 months agoTegan
2 months agoShawnda
2 months agoBeula
3 months agoTyra
3 months agoHenriette
3 months agoLemuel
3 months agoKristeen
4 months agoAugustine
4 months agoClarence
4 months agoVallie
4 months agoDorothy
5 months agoFarrah
5 months agoRosita
5 months agoRebbecca
5 months agoFannie
5 months agoMaile
6 months agoSage
6 months agoLevi
6 months agoOlga
6 months agoMaryln
6 months agoGracia
7 months agoChristiane
7 months agoBrittney
7 months ago