A clothing manufacturer has operations throughout Europe and needs to manage access to the data.
There is data for the following countries under the field SACOUNTRY -> France, Spain, United Kingdom and Germany. The application has been designed with Section Access to manage the data displayed.
What is the expected outcome of this Section Access table?
In this Section Access script, the roles and access to data for different users are defined based on the SACOUNTRY field. Here's how the data access will work:
ADMIN: The ADMIN user has access to all data because the * in the SACOUNTRY field allows full access to all countries in the dataset.
USER1: This user has access to Spain and France because the SACOUNTRY field specifies these countries for USER1.
USER2: This user has access to United Kingdom because the SACOUNTRY field specifies only the UK for USER2.
Key Concepts:
Section Access: This feature in Qlik Sense controls which data users can see based on their login credentials. The access rights are controlled through fields like ACCESS, USERID, and SACOUNTRY in this case.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
B and C: These suggest that users won't see data they have access to, which contradicts the defined Section Access script.
D: This incorrectly assumes that ADMIN cannot see Germany, which is not defined in the script.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Section Access Best Practices: In Qlik Sense, Section Access tables define the data that users can see, and the use of * for the ADMIN role ensures access to all data.
Thus, A is the correct answer because it matches the expected data access behavior based on the script, making it the verified answer.
A customer needs to distribute sales data to a variety of teams. The internal analyst team requires a global view of dat
a. The sales team requires mobile device access.
Which solution will meet the needs of both teams?
To meet the needs of both the internal analyst team and the sales team, the best solution is to create two separate apps: one designed specifically for mobile use and another for internal use. Mobile devices require different UI considerations, such as simpler, touch-optimized layouts, while the internal team can benefit from a more detailed app optimized for desktop use. Designing separate apps ensures that both teams have a tailored experience that suits their specific devices and use cases.
Key Concepts:
Mobile Optimization: Mobile devices require apps that are streamlined and optimized for smaller screens, while internal users on desktop computers can handle more complex layouts and detailed reports.
Separate Apps: Creating separate apps ensures that each team gets the best user experience tailored to their needs.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . One app with a specific extension for mobile users: While extensions can provide some mobile functionality, they don't offer the flexibility and optimization needed for a fully mobile-friendly experience.
C . A mashup with various objects: A mashup may provide flexibility, but it could be overly complex for this requirement and wouldn't necessarily offer an optimal mobile experience.
D . One app with various objects: This could complicate the user experience for both teams, as mobile users may struggle with objects that are not optimized for their devices.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Mobile vs. Desktop App Design: Qlik Sense recommends optimizing apps for specific devices to ensure the best user experience for both desktop and mobile users.
Thus, B is the correct answer because it provides the best solution for both the mobile sales team and the internal analyst team, making it the verified answer.
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibits.
A business analyst must add a list of temporary employees (interns) to the current sales app. The app contains an existing employees table. When the business analyst profiles the data, the association view displays possible associations as shown.
Which action should the business analyst take in Data manager to meet the requirements?
The InternEmp table contains information about temporary employees (interns), and the Employees table contains regular employee data. To properly link these two tables, the business analyst needs to create an association between the EmpID in the InternEmp table and the EmployeeID in the Employees table. This will ensure that the two tables are correctly associated based on the employee identifiers, allowing the system to relate both tables in the data model.
Key Concepts:
Association: Qlik Sense automatically suggests associations between tables based on field names. By linking EmpID from InternEmp with EmployeeID from Employees, the tables can be properly related in the data model.
Association View: The association view in Data Manager helps visualize how tables are connected and suggests appropriate links between tables based on common fields.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . Create a concatenated key: Concatenation is unnecessary for this scenario since the data model relies on direct associations between keys.
B . Concatenate the tables: Concatenating the InternEmp table into the Employees table would combine the records, but it's not appropriate since the two tables should remain separate entities.
C . Force an association between InternEmp and Orders: There's no need to associate InternEmp with Orders directly since the focus is on employees and interns.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Field Associations in Qlik Sense: Properly associating fields between tables is crucial for building a clean and efficient data model in Qlik Sense.
Thus, creating an association between EmpID and EmployeeID is the best approach, making D the correct answer.
A business analyst from the APAC region is creating a single KPI object for that region.
The analyst must meet the following requirements:
* The KPI should show a total of sales
* The business wants to compare current year (CY) vs last year (LY) sales
* The KPI should not change if the user makes selections
Which measure(s) will allow the KPI object to fulfill this requirement?
A)
B)
C)
D)
For the KPI object that meets the requirements of comparing Current Year (CY) sales against Last Year (LY) sales, while ensuring the KPI remains static regardless of selections, we need to leverage Set Analysis with the 1 identifier. This ensures the KPI ignores any selections made by the user.
Option A uses the correct structure of Set Analysis that compares CY sales to LY sales within the APAC region, and the 1 set identifier ensures the KPI does not change based on selections. The logic is structured as follows:
Sum({1 <region={'apac'}, year={$(=max(year))}>} Sales) computes the sales for the APAC region for the current year (CY).
Sum({1 <region={'apac'}, year={$(=max(year)-1)}>} Sales) computes the sales for the APAC region for the previous year (LY).
This expression will ensure that the comparison of sales between CY and LY is made, without being affected by user selections.
Key Concepts:
Set Analysis with 1: The 1 set identifier ensures that selections made by users do not affect the result, making the KPI static.
Comparison of CY vs. LY: The use of $(=max(year)) and $(=max(year)-1) ensures that the current and previous years are dynamically compared.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
B, C, and D: While these options use a similar structure, they do not correctly handle the measure structure or have syntactical issues. Only Option A properly utilizes the 1 set identifier and dynamic year comparison for the APAC region.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Set Analysis for Static KPIs: Using the 1 set identifier in Qlik Sense ensures that a KPI remains static and unaffected by user selections, which is essential for business requirements like this.
Thus, A is the correct choice because it correctly computes the required static KPI for the APAC region, making it the verified answer.
The sales manager is investigating the relationship between Sales and Margin to determine if this relationship is linear when choosing the dimension Customer or Product Category.
The sales manager wants to have the potential percentage Sales for each Stage (Initial to Won) of the sales process.
Which visualizations will meet these requirements?
For analyzing the relationship between Sales and Margin, a scatter plot is ideal, as it allows you to visualize the relationship between two measures (Sales and Margin) across various dimensions such as Customer or Product Category. The funnel chart is perfect for visualizing stages in a sales process, as it shows how sales progress from the initial stage to the final (Won) stage, with the width of each segment representing the total sales for each stage.
Key Concepts:
Scatter Plot: This type of chart is specifically designed to visualize the correlation or relationship between two measures, making it ideal for analyzing Sales versus Margin across different dimensions.
Funnel Chart: This chart is particularly suited for visualizing the sales stages, as it visually demonstrates the proportion of sales moving through each stage of the sales funnel.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . Scatter plot and Bar chart: While a scatter plot is correct for analyzing Sales and Margin, a bar chart won't adequately represent the different stages of the sales process as effectively as a funnel chart.
C . Combo chart and Pie chart: A combo chart could potentially work, but it would not show the relationship between Sales and Margin as clearly as a scatter plot. A pie chart is also less effective for representing stages in a sales funnel.
D . Distribution plot and Bar chart: A distribution plot does not effectively show the relationship between two measures, and a bar chart isn't the best choice for visualizing the stages of a sales process.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Scatter Plot for Relationships: This chart type is highly recommended when exploring relationships between two continuous variables, such as Sales and Margin.
Funnel Charts: These are ideal for visualizing how data moves through various stages of a process, such as sales stages, from initial engagement to final sale.
Therefore, the combination of a scatter plot and a funnel chart provides the best solution, making B the correct answer.
Beula
14 days agoTyra
15 days agoHenriette
28 days agoLemuel
29 days agoKristeen
1 months agoAugustine
1 months agoClarence
2 months agoVallie
2 months agoDorothy
2 months agoFarrah
2 months agoRosita
3 months agoRebbecca
3 months agoFannie
3 months agoMaile
3 months agoSage
4 months agoLevi
4 months agoOlga
4 months agoMaryln
4 months agoGracia
5 months agoChristiane
5 months agoBrittney
5 months ago