BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Qlik Exam QSDA2024 Topic 5 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Qlik's QSDA2024 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 5
[All QSDA2024 Questions]

A table is generated resulting from the following script:

When the data architect selects a date, some, but NOT all, orders for that date are shown.

How should the data architect modify the script to show all orders for the selected date?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The issue described is that not all orders for a selected date are shown. This issue arises because the original script uses the Date(OrderTime) function, which only extracts the date part of the OrderTime timestamp, potentially resulting in incorrect matching when filtering by date due to the time component still being present in the underlying data.

Explanation of Option D:

Floor(OrderTime): The Floor() function truncates the OrderTime timestamp to remove the time component, leaving only the date part. This ensures that all orders on the same date are treated equally, without any interference from the time component.

Date(Floor(OrderTime), 'YYYY-MM-DD'): The Date() function formats the floored value into a date format (YYYY-MM-DD), which is essential for consistent date comparison.

This approach ensures that when you select a date in the application, all orders for that date are shown, as the time component has been effectively removed.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Shayne
1 months ago
I see your point, Krissy. Option B could be the correct answer to modify the script.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 months ago
What is this, a magic trick? We need to show all the orders, not just some of them. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
2 months ago
Hmm, that's a good point, Krissy. Option B does seem to show all orders for the selected date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
2 months ago
Option D? Really? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Keep it simple, people!
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
17 days ago
Yeah, Option D might be a bit too much. Option A is the simpler and more efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
18 days ago
I agree, Option A is definitely the way to go. No need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
19 days ago
Option A seems like the best choice here. It's always good to keep things simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
30 days ago
Let's go with Option A then, keeping it simple is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
1 months ago
Yeah, Option D does seem a bit overkill for this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
1 months ago
I agree, Option A seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
1 months ago
I think Option A would be the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krissy
2 months ago
I think Option B might be a better choice because it looks like it includes all orders for the selected date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
2 months ago
I agree with you, Ryann. Option A seems like the right choice to modify the script.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
2 months ago
I think the data architect should modify the script to show all orders for the selected date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A and B both look like they could work. I'll have to think this one through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
Doug
28 days ago
True, Option B is worth considering as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
29 days ago
But Option B also seems like it could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
1 months ago
I agree, Option A looks promising.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
1 months ago
I think Option A might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristine
2 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with Option C. That UNION ALL statement is the perfect solution for this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
2 months ago
Option B looks good to me. Joins are the way to go when you need to combine multiple tables.
upvoted 0 times
Lonna
2 months ago
Yes, Option B is the best way to show all orders for the selected date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
2 months ago
Yes, Option B is the correct one. Joins help in combining tables effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
2 months ago
I agree, Option B is the correct choice for combining multiple tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
2 months ago
I agree, Option B is the best choice for showing all orders for the selected date.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel