Refer to the exhibit.
What is the total amount of usable storage space consumed on this FlashArray system?
Why This Matters:
Usable Storage Space Consumed:
The 'usable storage space consumed' refers to the actual physical capacity used on the array after accounting for RAID overhead but before applying data reduction techniques like deduplication and compression.
This value represents the raw space utilized by the data stored on the array, excluding any logical space savings from data reduction.
Why Not the Other Options?
B . 5.58 T:
This value likely represents the logical capacity provisioned or consumed after applying data reduction techniques (e.g., deduplication and compression). However, the question specifically asks for the usable storage space consumed , which excludes logical space savings.
C . 1.22 T:
This value might represent the raw capacity of the drives or some other metric unrelated to the usable storage space consumed. It does not align with the definition of usable storage space.
D . 4.36 T:
This value could represent an intermediate calculation or another metric, but it does not match the usable storage space consumed as shown in the exhibit.
Key Points:
Usable Storage Space Consumed: Represents the physical capacity used on the array after RAID overhead but before data reduction.
Logical vs. Physical Capacity: Logical capacity reflects space savings from deduplication and compression, while usable storage space reflects the actual physical usage.
Exhibit Analysis: Carefully interpret the metrics provided in the exhibit to identify the correct value.
Pure Storage FlashArray Documentation: 'Understanding Array Capacity Metrics'
Pure Storage Whitepaper: 'Capacity Management and Data Reduction'
Pure Storage Knowledge Base: 'What is Usable Space vs. Raw Space?'
A customer has presented two workloads that need to be replicated. One is a highly transactional database workload and the other is a VM datastore with tier one applications.
The customer has the following requirements:
* The database workload is highly reliant on storage performance The VM datastore requires zero downtime.
* The customer has advised the two FlashArrays will be 20 miles apart and they are worried that this could impact their internal SLAs.
What replication strategies should be advised for these workloads?
To address the customer's requirements, we need to evaluate the replication strategies offered by Pure Storage FlashArray: ActiveCluster and ActiveDR , and how they align with the specific needs of the two workloads.
Workload Analysis:
Transactional Database Workload :
This workload is highly reliant on storage performance. Any replication strategy must ensure minimal latency and high availability to avoid impacting transactional throughput and response times.
The database workload typically benefits from synchronous replication to maintain consistency and performance across sites.
VM Datastore (Tier 1 Applications) :
This workload requires zero downtime, meaning it must remain accessible even in the event of a site failure. High availability and seamless failover are critical.
The VM datastore can tolerate some level of asynchronous replication as long as it does not compromise availability or recovery objectives.
Replication Strategies:
ActiveCluster :
ActiveCluster is a synchronous replication solution that provides active-active high availability across two FlashArrays. It ensures zero RPO (Recovery Point Objective) and zero RTO (Recovery Time Objective), making it ideal for workloads requiring continuous availability and zero downtime.
ActiveCluster is well-suited for the VM datastore workload because it guarantees seamless failover and high availability, meeting the zero-downtime requirement.
ActiveDR :
ActiveDR is an asynchronous replication solution designed for disaster recovery scenarios. It provides near-zero RPO (typically seconds to minutes) and allows for non-disruptive testing of failover scenarios.
ActiveDR is better suited for the transactional database workload because it minimizes the impact of latency over the 20-mile distance while still maintaining high performance and consistency.
Distance Consideration:
The 20-mile distance between the two FlashArrays introduces latency concerns. Synchronous replication (ActiveCluster) can handle this distance effectively for the VM datastore workload due to its tolerance for slightly higher latency. However, for the transactional database workload, the latency could degrade performance, making ActiveDR a better choice.
Final Recommendation:
Use ActiveCluster for the VM datastore workload to achieve zero downtime and high availability.
Use ActiveDR for the transactional database workload to balance performance and disaster recovery needs over the 20-mile distance.
Pure Storage ActiveCluster Documentation :
Explains the synchronous replication capabilities and use cases for ActiveCluster.
Pure Storage ActiveDR Documentation :
Details the asynchronous replication features and disaster recovery use cases for ActiveDR.
Pure Storage Best Practices for Replication :
Provides guidance on selecting the appropriate replication strategy based on workload requirements and distance considerations.
Pure Storage Replication Best Practices
Pure Storage Architectural Guides :
Covers architectural considerations for deploying ActiveCluster and ActiveDR in multi-site environments.
Pure Storage Architectural Guides
This approach ensures that both workloads meet their respective SLAs while addressing the customer's concerns about distance and performance.
A potential healthcare customer wants to move to a modern storage array for their medical records database. They need the fastest possible array as their workload is highly transactional.
Which solution should an SE recommend?
To meet the healthcare customer's requirement for the fastest possible array for a highly transactional medical records database, FlashArray//XL is the optimal choice. Here's why:
Analysis of FlashArray Models:
FlashArray//XL :
The FlashArray//XL is Pure Storage's highest-performance all-flash storage array, designed for mission-critical, high-transaction workloads that demand ultra-low latency and maximum throughput.
It offers the highest IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second), bandwidth, and capacity scaling capabilities in the FlashArray family, making it ideal for workloads like medical records databases that require extreme performance.
With its advanced NVMe architecture and DirectFlash Modules, FlashArray//XL delivers sub-millisecond latency and exceptional performance consistency, which are critical for transactional workloads.
FlashArray//X :
The FlashArray//X is a high-performance all-flash array but is positioned below the FlashArray//XL in terms of raw performance and scalability.
While it is suitable for most enterprise workloads, it may not provide the same level of performance as FlashArray//XL for highly transactional databases with demanding I/O requirements.
FlashArray//C :
The FlashArray//C is optimized for capacity and cost efficiency rather than raw performance.
It uses QLC NAND flash technology, which is more cost-effective but has lower endurance and performance compared to the TLC NAND used in FlashArray//X and FlashArray//XL.
This makes FlashArray//C unsuitable for highly transactional workloads like a medical records database.
Recommendation:
Given the customer's need for the 'fastest possible array' and the highly transactional nature of their workload, FlashArray//XL is the best recommendation. Its ability to deliver consistent, low-latency performance at scale ensures that the medical records database will perform optimally under heavy transactional loads.
FlashArray//XL Product Overview :
Details the performance and use cases for FlashArray//XL.
FlashArray//X Product Overview :
Explains the capabilities of FlashArray//X for enterprise workloads.
FlashArray//C Product Overview :
Highlights the cost-efficient design of FlashArray//C for capacity-focused workloads.
An admin is setting up replication and has set up a Protection Group. What are the three choices when adding Members? (Select three.)
When setting up replication on a Pure Storage FlashArray, an admin creates a Protection Group to define which entities will be replicated to a remote FlashArray. When adding members to a Protection Group, there are three valid choices: Volumes , Snapshots , and Host Groups . Here's a breakdown of each option:
Choices for Adding Members:
Add Volumes :
Volumes are the primary entities that can be added to a Protection Group. Replication ensures that the data within these volumes is copied to the remote FlashArray.
This is the most common use case for replication, especially for protecting critical data such as databases or virtual machine disks.
Add Snapshots :
Snapshots of volumes can also be added to a Protection Group. This allows point-in-time copies of the data to be replicated to the remote array.
Snapshots are useful for disaster recovery scenarios where you need to restore data to a specific point in time.
Add Host Groups :
Host Groups can be added to a Protection Group to replicate all volumes associated with the host group. This simplifies management when multiple volumes are tied to a single application or server.
Replicating Host Groups ensures that all related volumes are protected together, maintaining consistency across the workload.
Incorrect Options:
A . Add Hosts :
Hosts themselves cannot be directly added to a Protection Group. Instead, replication focuses on the data (volumes) or logical groupings (host groups) associated with the hosts.
E . Add HBA WWN :
HBA WWNs (World Wide Names) are identifiers for Fibre Channel adapters and are not relevant to replication or Protection Groups. They are used for zoning and connectivity but do not play a role in defining replication members.
Final Recommendation:
The correct options are B. Add Volumes , C. Add Snapshots , and D. Add Host Groups , as these are the valid entities that can be added to a Protection Group for replication.
Pure Storage Protection Groups Documentation :
Pure Storage Protection Groups
Provides detailed guidance on creating and managing Protection Groups.
Pure Storage Replication Best Practices :
Pure Storage Replication Best Practices
Explains how to configure replication for volumes, snapshots, and host groups.
Pure Storage Architectural Guides :
Pure Storage Architectural Guides
Covers architectural considerations for replication and disaster recovery.
A customer wants to have more insight into and control of their Pure Storage FlashArray and VMware environment from a single user interface. What does the customer need to do to enable this capability in their environment?
To gain more insight and control over their Pure Storage FlashArray and VMware environment from a single user interface, the customer should configure the FlashArray Management Pack for vRealize Operations Manager (vROps) . Here's why:
Analysis of Options:
A . Ensure all VMware API for Array Integration (VAAI) primitives are enabled :
VAAI is a set of APIs that offloads storage tasks from the ESXi host to the storage array, improving performance and efficiency. However, it does not provide a unified interface for managing both FlashArray and VMware environments.
B . Log in to the FlashArray GUI and install the plugin for vSphere Client :
While the FlashArray plugin for vSphere Client provides some integration, such as provisioning and monitoring FlashArray volumes directly from the vSphere Client, it does not offer comprehensive visibility and control over both environments from a single interface.
C . Configure FlashArray Management Pack for vRealize Operations Manager :
The FlashArray Management Pack for vROps integrates Pure Storage FlashArray with VMware vRealize Operations Manager, enabling centralized monitoring, analytics, and management of both environments from a single pane of glass.
This solution provides deep insights into storage performance, capacity utilization, and health metrics, making it the ideal choice for the customer's requirement.
D . Install Pure Storage SRA for VMware Site Recovery Manager (SRM) :
The Pure Storage Storage Replication Adapter (SRA) is used for disaster recovery orchestration with VMware SRM. It does not provide a unified interface for managing FlashArray and VMware environments.
Recommendation:
The correct answer is C. Configure FlashArray Management Pack for vRealize Operations Manager , as it fulfills the customer's need for a single user interface to manage both FlashArray and VMware environments.
Pure Storage FlashArray Management Pack for vROps Documentation :
FlashArray Management Pack for vROps
Explains how to integrate FlashArray with vROps for unified monitoring and management.
Pure Storage VMware Integration Overview :
Pure Storage VMware Integration
Provides an overview of Pure Storage's VMware integration solutions.
Cassandra
6 days agoGlenna
7 days ago