BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pure Storage Exam FBAP_002 Topic 6 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FBAP_002 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 6
[All FBAP_002 Questions]

A customer has hundreds of TB of data that they need to archive for 20 years. The customer will need to completely destroy the dat

a. They will only to access the data once or twice during the 20 years. The data is very sensitive. It would be a serious security breach if anyone accessed the data during that time. The customer is considering NAS.

Why should the architect recommend another solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Natalie at Sep 14, 2024, 02:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FBAP_002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jamal
1 months ago
Seriously, NAS? The customer might as well just bury the data in their backyard and hope a friendly mole doesn't uncover it. C'mon, let's think outside the box here!
upvoted 0 times
Dorothea
3 days ago
B) NAS will be too expensive compared to other satisfactory solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
9 days ago
A) NAS will NOT meet the isolation and security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micaela
1 months ago
NAS? Psh, that's like using a paper bag to protect the crown jewels. This calls for a solution that can withstand the test of time, like a vault made of adamantium and sprinkled with pixie dust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
2 months ago
Ah, the good ol' 20-year data archive. Sounds like a job for a time capsule, not some fancy NAS setup. I mean, who needs to access that data anyways?
upvoted 0 times
Janey
18 days ago
B) NAS will be to expensive compared to other satisfactory solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
21 days ago
B) NAS will be too expensive compared to other satisfactory solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
26 days ago
C) NAS storage mediums will degrade too much during the required 20 year of archive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
28 days ago
C) NAS storage mediums will degrade too much during the required 20 year of archive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
29 days ago
A) NAS will NOT meet the isolation and security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 months ago
A) NAS will NOT meet the isolation and security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
2 months ago
That's a good point, Alesia. Security is definitely a top priority for the customer in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
2 months ago
C'mon, 20 years of storage? NAS is for amateurs! We need some serious tech to keep that data safe and sound for the long haul.
upvoted 0 times
Corinne
1 months ago
B) NAS will be to expensive compared to other satisfactory solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 months ago
C) NAS storage mediums will degrade too much during the required 20 year of archive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
2 months ago
A) NAS will NOT meet the isolation and security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alesia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the best choice as NAS will not meet the isolation and security requirements for such sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 months ago
I think the architect should recommend option C because NAS storage mediums may degrade too much over 20 years.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel