BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pure Storage Exam FBAP_002 Topic 3 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FBAP_002 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 3
[All FBAP_002 Questions]

A customer is developing a AI workflow that Ingests sensor data to FlashBlade NFS from its cloud edge collection point for furthers analysis.

The customer's HPC cluster mounts NFS to train the data but S3 to label.

Which challenge will the architect experience with this design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carissa
1 months ago
I'm guessing the architect is going to have a tough time with this one. Option A sounds like the most logical choice, unless they want to end up with a big ol' cluster of incompatible storage systems.
upvoted 0 times
Chauncey
3 days ago
Definitely, it's important to consider compatibility when setting up storage systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
14 days ago
That's right, having separate namespaces for NFS and S3 could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
17 days ago
Option A) NFS and S3 are NOT a shared namespace.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolande
1 months ago
Haha, this is like trying to mix oil and water. NFS and S3 are about as compatible as cats and dogs. The architect better choose option A if they want to avoid a major migraine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
1 months ago
Ah, the old NFS-S3 conundrum. I bet the architect is going to have a headache trying to make this work. Option A is definitely the way to go, unless they want to end up with a tangled mess of file paths and data silos.
upvoted 0 times
Vernell
24 days ago
Agreed, it's important to maintain clarity in the workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
26 days ago
That's right, keeping them separate will avoid confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
30 days ago
Option A) NFS and S3 are NOT a shared namespace.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keneth
1 months ago
But couldn't the architect just use different data VIPs for NFS and S3 to overcome this challenge?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
1 months ago
I agree with Joseph, having different namespaces for NFS and S3 could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
I think the challenge will be that NFS and S3 are not a shared namespace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is A. NFS and S3 are not a shared namespace, so the architect will face challenges in integrating the two. Trying to use both in the same workflow sounds like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Myrtie
16 days ago
It's important to plan the integration of different systems carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
17 days ago
Maybe they should consider using a different approach for their workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
18 days ago
That's true, it will definitely cause challenges for the architect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
26 days ago
I agree, A) NFS and S3 are NOT a shared namespace.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel