Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRMIA Exam 8010 Topic 1 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRMIA's 8010 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 1
[All 8010 Questions]

What would be the correct order of steps to addressing data quality problems in an organization?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In the univariate Gaussian model, each risk factor is modeled separately independent of the others, and the dependence between the risk factors is captured by the covariance matrix (or its equivalent combination of the correlation matrix and the variance matrix). Risk factors could include interest rates of different tenors, different equity market levels etc.

While this is a simple enough model, it has a number of limitations.

First, it fails to fit to the empirical distributions of risk factors, notably their fat tails and skewness. Second, a single covariance matrix is insufficient to describe the fine codependence structure among risk factors as non-linear dependencies or tail correlations are not captured. Third, determining the covariance matrix becomes an extremely difficult task as the number of risk factors increases. The number of covariances increases by the square of the number of variables.

But an inability to capture linear relationships between the factors is not one of the limitations of the univariate Gaussian approach - in fact it is able to do that quite nicely with covariances.

A way to address these limitations is to consider joint distributions of the risk factors that capture the dynamic relationships between the risk factors, and that correlation is not a static number across an entire range of outcomes, but the risk factors can behave differently with each other at different intersection points.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Amie
1 months ago
Option A all the way! It's like a data quality problem-solving roadmap. I can almost smell the spreadsheets and data visualizations already.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
1 months ago
B is too vague. Articulating goals and doing a 'strategy-fit' analysis are important, but they don't really address the practical steps of improving data quality.
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
17 days ago
A) Assess the current state, design the future state, determine gaps and the actions required to be implemented to eliminate the gaps
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mattie
1 months ago
D is definitely not the right answer. Calling in external consultants is not a step in addressing data quality problems. That's more of a last resort, if you don't have the internal expertise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Designing the future state first, then analyzing the current state, and finally implementing the changes. It makes sense to have a clear vision before diving into the details.
upvoted 0 times
Sabrina
2 days ago
I prefer Option B, setting clear goals and planning for action seems like a strategic way to address data quality problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
4 days ago
I think Option A might also be a good approach, assessing the current state can provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
16 days ago
I agree with you, having a clear vision is important before making any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thomasena
2 months ago
Option A seems to cover all the necessary steps in a logical order. Assess the current state, design the future state, and then determine the actions needed to bridge the gap. Seems straightforward enough.
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
16 days ago
Charisse: It's important to have a clear plan of action to eliminate any gaps in data quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
19 days ago
User 2: Definitely, assessing the current state first and then designing the future state makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
25 days ago
User 1: I agree, option A seems like the most logical order of steps to address data quality problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tennie
2 months ago
I think option C) Design the future state, perform a gap analysis, analyze the current state and implement the future state is the correct order. We need to first design the future state before assessing the current state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
2 months ago
I agree with Mitsue. It's important to first assess the current state before designing the future state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
3 months ago
I think the correct order is A) Assess the current state, design the future state, determine gaps and the actions required to be implemented to eliminate the gaps.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel