Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRMIA Exam 8010 Topic 1 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRMIA's Operational Risk Manager (ORM) Exam exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 1
[All Operational Risk Manager (ORM) Exam Questions]

Which of the following is not a limitation of the univariate Gaussian model to capture the codependence structure between risk factros used for VaR calculations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In the univariate Gaussian model, each risk factor is modeled separately independent of the others, and the dependence between the risk factors is captured by the covariance matrix (or its equivalent combination of the correlation matrix and the variance matrix). Risk factors could include interest rates of different tenors, different equity market levels etc.

While this is a simple enough model, it has a number of limitations.

First, it fails to fit to the empirical distributions of risk factors, notably their fat tails and skewness. Second, a single covariance matrix is insufficient to describe the fine codependence structure among risk factors as non-linear dependencies or tail correlations are not captured. Third, determining the covariance matrix becomes an extremely difficult task as the number of risk factors increases. The number of covariances increases by the square of the number of variables.

But an inability to capture linear relationships between the factors is not one of the limitations of the univariate Gaussian approach - in fact it is able to do that quite nicely with covariances.

A way to address these limitations is to consider joint distributions of the risk factors that capture the dynamic relationships between the risk factors, and that correlation is not a static number across an entire range of outcomes, but the risk factors can behave differently with each other at different intersection points.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Felicidad
27 days ago
Wow, this question really separates the quants from the quantitative eggheads! Time to bust out the Excel and get to work on that covariance matrix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
28 days ago
D is also a valid limitation. The covariance matrix alone is not enough to describe the full codependence structure, especially for non-linear relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
1 months ago
I agree with Brandon. The Gaussian assumption is too restrictive and doesn't reflect the real-world complexity of risk factor dynamics.
upvoted 0 times
Donte
23 days ago
D) A single covariance matrix is insufficient to describe the fine codependence structure among risk factors as non-linear dependencies or tail correlations are not captured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
24 days ago
A) The univariate Gaussian model fails to fit to the empirical distributions of risk factors, notably their fat tails and skewness.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beatriz
2 months ago
That's a limitation too, but I think the inability to capture non-linear dependencies is a bigger issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
2 months ago
But what about the difficulty in determining the covariance matrix with increasing risk factors?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
2 months ago
The correct answer is A. The Gaussian model fails to capture the empirical distributions of risk factors, which often exhibit fat tails and skewness.
upvoted 0 times
Vicki
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, the Gaussian model doesn't fit the empirical distributions well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
1 months ago
User 1: I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Andrew
2 months ago
I agree with Beatriz, the fat tails and skewness are not captured well by the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
2 months ago
I think the limitation is that the univariate Gaussian model fails to fit to the empirical distributions of risk factors.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel