Which of the following statements are true in respect of a fixed income portfolio:
1. A hedge based on portfolio duration is valid only for small changes in interest rates and needs periodic readjusting
II. A duration based portfolio hedge can be improved by making a convexity adjustment
III. A long position in bonds benefits from the resulting negative convexity
IV. A duration based hedge makes the implicit assumption that only parallel shifts in the yield curve are possible
A hedge based on portfolio duration alone makes the assumption that the price/yield relationship is linear, and ignores the convexity or non-linearity of the price/yield relationship. As prices change beyond small changes, the non-linear effect kicks in, which can be offset by making a convexity adjustment to the hedge. Therefore statements I and II are correct.
Statement III is incorrect - negative convexity has an adverse effect on bond prices regardless of whether prices rise or fall.
Statement IV is correct, a bond hedge based on duration alone may be mismatched along the yield curve (eg, hedging a 10 year maturity bond with a 3 year futures contract, even though of identical total durations), which is based upon the implicit assumption that all rates will move together (ie parallel shifts).
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!