Given identical prices, a bond trader prefers dealing with Bank A over Bank B. Given a choice between Bank B and Bank C, he prefers Bank B. Yet, when given a choice between Bank A and Bank C, he prefers dealing with Bank C. What axiom underlying the utility theory is he violating?
Remember the four basic axioms underlying the principal of maximum expected utility:
- Transitivity, ie if A is preferred over B, and B is preferred over C, then A must be preferred over C;
- Continuity, ie if A is preferred over B, and B is preferred over C, then B is on a continuum between A and C such that we can be indifferent between receiving B, or a lottery offering either A or C with probabilities p & 1-p respectively.
- Independence, ie choices are not affected by the way they are presented
- Stochastic dominance, ie a gamble that offers a greater probability of a preferred out come will be preferred.
In this case, the first axiom is being violated. Therefore Choice 'c' is the correct answer.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!