Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PostgreSQL PGCES-02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for PostgreSQL's PGCES-02 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 4
[All PGCES-02 Questions]

You want to set a constraint so that the "item_id" in the "sales" table will always have a value that already exists as "id" in the "item_master" table. Select the correct SQL statement to fill in the underlined blank of the "sales" table. Definitions: CREATE TABLE item_master ( id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT ); CREATE TABLE sales ( sales_id INTEGER, item_id INTEGER, num INTEGER, );

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

by Marge at Jan 23, 2024, 05:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PGCES-02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Corinne
4 months ago
Surprised that E is so misleading!
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
4 months ago
I thought it was C at first, but B is right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
4 months ago
Wait, why is A even an option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
4 months ago
Totally agree, B makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
5 months ago
B is the correct choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
5 months ago
I definitely remember that the foreign key needs to reference the primary key, so I think B is the right choice since it links "item_id" to "id".
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the syntax here. I feel like it could be either B or D, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the correct answer is B because it matches the "item_id" in sales to the "id" in item_master.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
5 months ago
I think the foreign key should reference the "id" in the "item_master" table, but I'm not sure which option that is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The "item_id" in the "sales" table needs to be a foreign key that references the "id" column in the "item_master" table, so the correct answer is option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
5 months ago
This is a straightforward foreign key constraint question. The "item_id" in the "sales" table needs to reference the "id" column in the "item_master" table, so the correct answer is option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to match the "item_id" column in the "sales" table to the "id" column in the "item_master" table. So the correct answer is option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the table definitions and think about the relationship between the two tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. The question is asking about setting a constraint, but the options seem to be about referencing columns. I'll need to double-check my understanding of foreign keys and referential integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is an A. Deduplicating the data is the best way to ensure no one gets the same email twice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. A digital network should provide secure data transport, so I'm leaning towards option C. But I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
6 months ago
I think since the maximum is set to 8, the system might just remain at 8, but I can't recall if it adds beyond that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
10 months ago
I bet the correct answer is 'ALTER TABLE sales ADD CONSTRAINT item_id_fkey FOREIGN KEY (item_id) REFERENCES item_master(id)'. I mean, who doesn't love a little extra SQL syntax to spice things up?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
10 months ago
I wonder if the exam writer is a secret comedian. 'FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES item_master (item_id)' - that's like trying to reference the moon by its serial number!
upvoted 0 times
Thora
8 months ago
Haha, yeah, that would be like referencing the moon by its serial number!
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
8 months ago
E) REFERENCES item_master (id) TO item_id
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
9 months ago
That's the correct SQL statement to set the constraint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
9 months ago
B) FOREIGN KEY (item_id) REFERENCES item_master (id)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darell
10 months ago
Ah, the joys of database design! I'm going to have to think this one through carefully. Maybe I'll just ask the database gods for a little guidance.
upvoted 0 times
Jamie
9 months ago
Yes, that way we ensure that the 'item_id' in 'sales' always matches an existing 'id' in 'item_master'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
10 months ago
That makes sense, we want to reference the 'id' column in 'item_master' from the 'item_id' column in 'sales'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
10 months ago
I think the correct SQL statement is B) FOREIGN KEY (item_id) REFERENCES item_master (id)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tonette
10 months ago
I'll go with D. It just makes sense to reference the primary key of the 'item_master' table, right? That way, we can ensure the integrity of the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. It's been a while since I've dealt with SQL constraints. Maybe I should brush up on my database fundamentals before taking this exam.
upvoted 0 times
Lucina
9 months ago
User1: Definitely, it helps maintain data integrity in the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
9 months ago
User2: That makes sense. It's important to have the foreign key reference the primary key in the other table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
10 months ago
User1: I think the correct SQL statement is B) FOREIGN KEY (item_id) REFERENCES item_master (id)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dallas
11 months ago
I think the answer is B. The 'item_id' in the 'sales' table should reference the 'id' column in the 'item_master' table, not the other way around.
upvoted 0 times
Chau
10 months ago
Thanks for confirming! It's important to set up the foreign key relationship correctly for data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
10 months ago
That's correct! The foreign key in the 'sales' table should reference the 'id' column in the 'item_master' table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
B) FOREIGN KEY (item_id) REFERENCES item_master (id)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
11 months ago
I'm not sure about the answer. Can someone explain why option B is the correct one?
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
11 months ago
I agree with Earlean. Using FOREIGN KEY (item_id) REFERENCES item_master (id) ensures that the 'item_id' in 'sales' table will always have a value that exists in the 'id' column of 'item_master' table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) FOREIGN KEY (item_id) REFERENCES item_master (id). It makes sense to reference the 'id' column in 'item_master' table.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel