PMI Exam PMI-PBA Topic 8 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam

Question #: 93
Topic #: 8

The business analyst has completed the requirements gathering and documentation processes in developing a baseline document. Several signoffs are needed. During the joint review process with the key stakeholders, the stakeholders announce that they are still not ready to sign off due to a communication gap.

Which technique should the business analyst have followed to ensure consensus?

AThe business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with one of the stakeholders' peers before the meeting.

BThe business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.

CThe business analyst should have reviewed the requirements of the project sponsor first before reviewing other requirements.

DThe business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, one of the techniques to ensure consensus among stakeholders is to conduct a pre-review of the requirements with the key stakeholders before the formal review meeting. This can help to identify and resolve any issues, gaps, or conflicts that may arise during the meeting. A pre-review can also help to build trust and rapport with the stakeholders, and increase their confidence and commitment to the requirements. A pre-review can be done through interviews, workshops, surveys, or other methods of communication.References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content:PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list:PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide:Study.com

by Mitsue at Nov 15, 2024, 06:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-PBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Yasuko

1 months ago

Option B all the way. The business analyst should have been on top of that communication gap before the big meeting. Gotta stay proactive, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Vonda

10 days ago

B) I agree, being proactive is key in ensuring effective communication and consensus.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jarod

11 days ago

A) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noemi

1 months ago

I can't believe the stakeholders weren't ready to sign off. They must have been playing Candy Crush during the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

Theresia

1 days ago

C) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with one of the stakeholders' peers before the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

2 days ago

B) The business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deangelo

20 days ago

A) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaclyn

2 months ago

I'm going with option B. The business analyst should have done a complete review with the stakeholders beforehand. That's like Requirements Gathering 101.

upvoted 0 times

Kayleigh

15 days ago

User1: Definitely, communication is key in these situations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

27 days ago

User3: Maybe next time they'll follow that process for better consensus.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

1 months ago

User2: Yeah, reviewing with stakeholders beforehand would have helped.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlton

1 months ago

User1: I agree, option B seems like the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merlyn

2 months ago

I disagree. I think the business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting directly to address any communication gaps in real-time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

2 months ago

Nah, the business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting. How else were they supposed to sign off on the requirements?

upvoted 0 times

Stephane

24 days ago

C) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with one of the stakeholders' peers before the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ora

1 months ago

B) The business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isidra

1 months ago

A) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tasia

2 months ago

I agree with you, Leonard. It's important to involve the key stakeholders in the review process to ensure their buy-in.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delmy

2 months ago

The business analyst should have reviewed the requirements with the key stakeholders before the meeting. That's just common sense.

upvoted 0 times

Rodney

1 months ago

C) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with one of the stakeholders' peers before the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Azalee

1 months ago

B) The business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephane

1 months ago

A) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonard

2 months ago

I think the business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...