I'm going with B) High-risk and low-value. Deferring those features allows the team to focus on the high-value stuff and mitigate the risky elements. Simple as that.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards C) Low-risk and low-value, but I can see the argument for B) as well. Gotta love these agile prioritization questions!
D) Low-risk and high-value seems like the obvious choice here. Why would we defer work on features that are low-risk and high-value? That doesn't align with the principles of agile development.
I think the correct answer is B) High-risk and low-value. Deferring work on features with high risk and low value makes the most sense in an agile environment, where delivering value is the top priority.
Penney
4 months agoLou
2 months agoIdella
3 months agoHortencia
3 months agoCasandra
3 months agoGlenna
3 months agoMarcelle
3 months agoNoemi
4 months agoJesusa
3 months agoCherrie
4 months agoWai
4 months agoMaile
4 months agoTegan
4 months agoAnnabelle
4 months agoLayla
4 months agoNikita
3 months agoLura
3 months agoLizbeth
3 months agoStephania
4 months agoBeula
4 months agoFrancene
4 months agoAdelina
4 months agoKendra
4 months ago