I'm going with B) High-risk and low-value. Deferring those features allows the team to focus on the high-value stuff and mitigate the risky elements. Simple as that.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards C) Low-risk and low-value, but I can see the argument for B) as well. Gotta love these agile prioritization questions!
D) Low-risk and high-value seems like the obvious choice here. Why would we defer work on features that are low-risk and high-value? That doesn't align with the principles of agile development.
I think the correct answer is B) High-risk and low-value. Deferring work on features with high risk and low value makes the most sense in an agile environment, where delivering value is the top priority.
Penney
5 months agoLou
3 months agoIdella
4 months agoHortencia
4 months agoCasandra
4 months agoGlenna
4 months agoMarcelle
4 months agoNoemi
5 months agoJesusa
4 months agoCherrie
5 months agoWai
5 months agoMaile
5 months agoTegan
5 months agoAnnabelle
5 months agoLayla
5 months agoNikita
4 months agoLura
4 months agoLizbeth
4 months agoStephania
5 months agoBeula
5 months agoFrancene
5 months agoAdelina
5 months agoKendra
5 months ago