PeopleCert ITIL-4-Practitioner-Deployment-Management Exam Questions

ITIL 4 emphasizes continual improvement in deployment management, which includes identifying and addressing inefficiencies in deployment models to enhance performance, reliability, and value delivery. Option D directly aligns with this principle by focusing on streamlining inefficient processes during model updates.

Option A (The impact of deployed software should not be considered when designing these models): Incorrect, as ITIL 4 stresses that the impact of deployments on services, users, and the organization is a critical consideration to ensure value and minimize disruption.

Option B (User resistance to updates is not a relevant factor to consider when designing deployment models): Incorrect, as user experience and acceptance are key factors in ITIL 4's value co-creation model, and resistance must be addressed to ensure successful deployments.

Option C (The same deployment approach should be used for deployments of similar size): Incorrect, as ITIL 4 advocates for context-specific deployment models tailored to the unique needs of each service or environment, not a one-size-fits-all approach.

Option D (Deployment model updates should consider inefficient processes): Correct, as improving deployment models involves analyzing current processes, identifying bottlenecks or waste, and optimizing workflows to deliver greater value.

ITIL 4 encourages collaborative and flexible relationships with suppliers to enhance deployment management, focusing on value co-creation rather than rigid controls. Option D is not aligned with this approach, as overly detailed and rigorous procedures can hinder adaptability and innovation in supplier relationships.

Option A (Considering dependencies on third parties when analyzing service value streams which include deployment management): Correct practice, as understanding supplier dependencies ensures effective integration of deployment activities into value streams.

Option B (Carefully selecting suppliers of software tools for CI/CD pipeline): Correct, as choosing reliable suppliers for CI/CD tools is critical to building a robust deployment management practice.

Option C (Involving third parties in review and planning of the value streams that include deployment management): Correct, as supplier involvement in planning fosters collaboration and ensures alignment with deployment goals.

Option D (Developing and enforcing detailed and rigorous procedures for every interaction between suppliers and the organization): Incorrect, as this approach is overly prescriptive and contradicts ITIL 4's emphasis on flexible, value-focused supplier relationships. It risks stifling collaboration and innovation.

The issue involves poor timing, lack of notice, and disruptions from deployments, which points to deficiencies in change planning and communication. ITIL 4 emphasizes aligning deployment with change enablement to ensure changes are scheduled and communicated effectively, addressing user concerns. Option C, aligning with the change enablement manager to improve change planning procedures, directly tackles these issues by ensuring deployments are timed appropriately, users are informed, and disruptions are minimized, while also ensuring feature relevance through better planning.

Option A (Use infrastructure as code to support the software deployment): Incorrect, as IaC improves environment consistency but does not address scheduling, notice, or user relevance issues.

Option B (Embed validation and testing within the deployment models): Incorrect, as while testing improves quality, it does not resolve timing or communication problems affecting users.

Option C (Align with the change enablement manager to improve the change planning procedures): Correct, as change enablement ensures deployments are planned with user needs in mind, including timing, communication, and relevance of features.

Option D (Integrate deployment management and configuration management activities to improve version control): Incorrect, as version control enhances deployment accuracy but does not address user complaints about timing or disruption.

ITIL 4's deployment management practice encompasses moving hardware, software, and associated components into or out of environments (e.g., staging, testing, or production) to support service delivery. Option A, which includes deploying network hubs (hardware) and removing applications from staging environments (software), accurately reflects this broad scope across the service lifecycle.

Option A (The practice includes deploying network hubs to and removing applications from staging environments): Correct, as it covers both hardware and software movements across environments, aligning with ITIL 4's definition of deployment management.

Option B (The practice includes updating service documentation and transferring it to the live environment): Incorrect, as updating and transferring documentation is part of knowledge management, not deployment management.

Option C (The practice includes removing configuration documentation but not physical servers from the live environment): Incorrect, as deployment management includes moving physical servers, and configuration documentation is managed elsewhere.

Option D (The practice includes deploying network hubs but not additional software licenses to the live environment): Incorrect, as software licenses may be part of deployment if required, and the option arbitrarily limits the scope.

In a DevOps environment with independent product teams and centralized governance, ITIL 4 recommends balancing autonomy with consistency. Option C, where a centralized deployment management team supports product teams by providing guidance and tooling, aligns with this approach. It ensures that teams retain flexibility to deploy efficiently while benefiting from standardized tools, best practices, and governance, maintaining organizational alignment and reducing risks of inconsistency.

Option A (Each development team should have an independent deployment manager who owns all aspects of deployment within that team): Incorrect, as fully independent deployment managers per team could lead to inconsistent practices and tools, undermining centralized governance and creating silos.

Option B (A centralized deployment management team should manage and coordinate deployments for all development teams): Incorrect, as centralizing all deployment activities reduces team autonomy, contradicting DevOps principles of empowering teams and slowing down delivery.

Option C (A centralized deployment management team should support the product teams by providing guidance and tooling): Correct, as it supports DevOps autonomy while ensuring consistency through shared tools (e.g., CI/CD pipelines) and guidance, aligning with ITIL 4's focus on value co-creation and governance.

Option D (Software developers in each team should take full responsibility for deployment of software that they develop): Incorrect, as while developers often handle deployments in DevOps, completely bypassing a structured deployment management practice risks non-compliance with governance and inconsistent outcomes.