Okay, let me think this through logically. A and B seem true, and D seems true too. That leaves C as the odd one out. I'm going with C as the false statement.
Haha, this question is like a brain teaser. I bet the test writers were sitting around trying to come up with the most convoluted way to ask about VIPs.
Wait, why wouldn't you want to test the sensitivity of the estimated costs and benefits? That seems like a crucial step to make sure the VIP is really worth implementing.
Okay, let's see here. A Study can combine multiple VIPs to form different scenarios, that seems reasonable. And a Study can generate multiple VIPs with conflicting recommendations, that also makes sense. But only one VIP should be implemented per Study? That doesn't sound right to me.
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. The answers seem to cover a lot of different aspects of Value Improving Proposals, so I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Tien
5 months agoNoel
6 months agoLatrice
6 months agoMerilyn
6 months agoTennie
7 months agoBettyann
7 months agoNakisha
7 months agoRodolfo
7 months agoRodolfo
5 months agoGianna
5 months agoIn
6 months agoThaddeus
7 months agoTruman
7 months ago