Ah, the age-old debate of traditional vs. advanced. I say we go with option B and really embrace the power of observability. It's the future, my friends!
You know, I was thinking the same thing. But then I remembered the question says 'BEST' type of reliability monitoring, and I don't know if option C really fits the bill. It's a bit too narrow, in my opinion.
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option C. Monitoring the performance of all active networks sounds like it could give us a really holistic view. Plus, discovering useful patterns? Sign me up!
Option D sounds intriguing, but I wonder if it's a bit too heavy on the advanced tech. We need a balance, you know? Something that leverages the best of both worlds.
I hear you, but I think option B is the way to go. Observability across all components and layers is key to understanding the full digital experience, don't you think?
Ah, this is a tricky one. Reliability is crucial, but I'm not sure I agree with those options. Shouldn't we be looking at a strategy that combines traditional and advanced approaches to really get a comprehensive view?
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Precious
7 months agoTalia
7 months agoParis
8 months agoStephaine
8 months agoIlene
9 months agoLuis
7 months agoErick
7 months agoKayleigh
8 months agoCheryl
9 months agoRolande
9 months agoGaynell
9 months agoAnnamae
9 months agoMicaela
9 months ago