I agree with Selma. B and D are the way to go. Gotta have that dedicated queue processor to keep things running smoothly across all those different time zones.
Ha! Midnight GMT, huh? Sounds like a real nightmare for the poor dev who has to deal with that. I'd go with B and D, just to make sure those global operations don't keep the rest of us up all night.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I was thinking A and C would work better. A standard queue processor should be able to handle this use case, and the Run in background step seems more straightforward than a dedicated queue processor.
I think B and D are the correct options. Using a dedicated queue processor with the Queue-For-Processing method and the Run in background step in the case life cycle seems like the best way to handle the global operations starting at midnight GMT.
Craig
3 months agoShaquana
3 months agoJuliann
1 months agoEden
1 months agoShaun
2 months agoKarrie
2 months agoRosalia
3 months agoFrederica
3 months agoMyong
3 months agoBrittney
2 months agoMa
2 months agoNickolas
2 months agoCraig
3 months agoSelma
3 months agoKenneth
2 months agoCristy
2 months agoNidia
3 months agoMiriam
3 months ago