New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCBA87V1 Topic 5 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCBA87V1 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 5
[All PEGAPCBA87V1 Questions]

An accident claim case creates a vehicle claim case for each vehicle involved in an accident.

Which two configurations prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

These answers are correct because they prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved, as per the requirement. By adding each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim, you can create a case hierarchy that allows you to manage related cases together. By adding a wait step to the accident claim case, you can pause the parent case until all child cases reach a specific status, such as Resolved. Reference: https://academy.pega.com/library/87/pega-certified-business-architect-pcba-87v1 (Module 5: Case Hierarchy)


by Barrie at Oct 24, 2024, 11:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCBA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Moon
28 days ago
As someone who's been in a few fender benders, I'd go with B and D. Parallel processing and child cases sound like a surefire way to keep everything on track. Plus, it gives me flashbacks to that time a squirrel caused a 10-car pileup. Good times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
29 days ago
Hold up, is this a trick question? I'm going with B and C - pause the accident case until the vehicle claims are paid, that way nothing slips through the cracks.
upvoted 0 times
Marla
8 days ago
Yeah, that way everything stays organized and nothing gets overlooked. Good choices!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
11 days ago
Adding each vehicle claim as a child case and pausing the accident case until the vehicle claims are paid sounds like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
19 days ago
I think B and C are the best options to prevent the accident claim case from resolving too soon.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
1 months ago
Hmm, I'd say B and D. Parallel processing for vehicle claims sounds efficient, and having them as child cases makes logical sense.
upvoted 0 times
Teri
4 days ago
Yeah, it would help keep everything organized and connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
26 days ago
I agree, having each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mattie
1 months ago
A and B make the most sense. Waiting for all vehicle claims to resolve is key, and making them child cases keeps everything tied together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
2 months ago
B and D are the way to go. Adding vehicle claims as child cases and processing them in parallel ensures the accident claim can't resolve until everything is done.
upvoted 0 times
Jame
19 days ago
Exactly, it's important to have a solid process in place to ensure all aspects of the claim are properly resolved before closing the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
22 days ago
I agree, having a wait step or an optional process wouldn't guarantee that all vehicle claims are resolved before the accident claim is resolved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
23 days ago
B and D are the way to go. Adding vehicle claims as child cases and processing them in parallel ensures the accident claim can't resolve until everything is done.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregg
2 months ago
I agree with you, Belen. Option B also seems like a good way to ensure all vehicle claims are resolved before the accident claim case closes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 months ago
I think option A is a good choice to prevent the accident claim case from resolving too soon.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel