Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCBA87V1 Topic 2 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCBA87V1 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 2
[All PEGAPCBA87V1 Questions]

An accident claim case creates a vehicle claim case for each vehicle involved in an accident.

Which two configurations prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

These answers are correct because they prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved, as per the requirement. By adding each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim, you can create a case hierarchy that allows you to manage related cases together. By adding a wait step to the accident claim case, you can pause the parent case until all child cases reach a specific status, such as Resolved. Reference: https://academy.pega.com/library/87/pega-certified-business-architect-pcba-87v1 (Module 5: Case Hierarchy)


by Dominga at Jul 07, 2024, 08:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCBA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Clay
25 days ago
I personally think option D is also a good choice because handling vehicle claims in parallel can expedite the resolution process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
29 days ago
Haha, C is like putting a bandaid on a broken leg. Totally useless. B and D are the only logical choices to keep things organized and on track.
upvoted 0 times
Deangelo
8 days ago
I agree, C seems like a temporary solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Abel
30 days ago
I agree with Berry, option A seems like a logical way to prevent the accident claim case from resolving too early.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
1 months ago
C is just silly. Pausing the accident claim until vehicle claims are paid? That's just asking for trouble. B and D are the clear winners here.
upvoted 0 times
Dana
3 days ago
D) Add a parallel process for vehicle claims in the accident claim resolution stage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
23 days ago
B) Add each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lyndia
1 months ago
I agree, B and D are the way to go. Waiting until all vehicle claims are resolved is the only way to ensure the accident claim is properly handled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
1 months ago
B and D seem like the best options to me. Adding the vehicle claims as child cases and running them in parallel would ensure the accident claim can't resolve until everything is sorted out.
upvoted 0 times
Catarina
12 days ago
It's important to have a solid process in place to make sure all vehicle claims are resolved before finalizing the accident claim case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
27 days ago
Running the vehicle claims in parallel also speeds up the resolution process, so the accident claim doesn't get held up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
30 days ago
I agree, having the vehicle claims as child cases and running them in parallel will help keep everything organized and prevent premature resolution of the accident claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 months ago
B and D are definitely the way to go. It ensures that all vehicle claims are resolved before the accident claim can be closed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
1 months ago
I agree, having the vehicle claims as child cases makes it easier to track and manage each one individually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
1 months ago
B and D are definitely the way to go. It keeps everything organized and ensures nothing slips through the cracks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Berry
2 months ago
I think option A is a good choice because it ensures all vehicle claims are resolved before the accident claim case is closed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel