BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPSA88V1 Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All PEGACPSA88V1 Questions]

Depending upon the purchase request amount, approvals cascade from the users to a loan officer, then to a director and finally to a vice president. The loan officer is the user's manager. The director is the loan officer's manager. The vice president is the director's manager.Which two approaches can you use to configure the cascading approval? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

by Frank at Jun 20, 2024, 05:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPSA88V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Reita
4 months ago
I see the benefits of both approaches, but I think I would go with option A and C for simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
4 months ago
A and B for sure. Gotta love those decision trees and tables - they're the approval process equivalent of a Swiss Army knife. Versatile and powerful.
upvoted 0 times
Fidelia
3 months ago
Definitely! They give us the flexibility we need to handle different scenarios efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
3 months ago
Yeah, decision trees and tables make it so much easier to set up the approval process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
4 months ago
B) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Table rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
4 months ago
A) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Tree rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Graciela
5 months ago
Haha, C and D? What is this, amateur hour? This approval process would be about as effective as a toddler trying to file their taxes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
5 months ago
C and D? Are you kidding me? Relying on the reporting structure alone is way too simplistic for a real-world approval process. Where's the nuance, the granularity?
upvoted 0 times
Leatha
3 months ago
B) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Table rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
4 months ago
A) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Tree rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elouise
5 months ago
I prefer option C and D, as using Reporting structure seems more straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
5 months ago
I agree, A and B are the way to go. You need a flexible approval process that can handle different thresholds and approvers based on the situation.
upvoted 0 times
Nickolas
4 months ago
B) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Table rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
4 months ago
A) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Tree rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Percy
5 months ago
I agree with Joesph, using Authority Matrix with Decision Tree or Decision Table makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
5 months ago
A and B seem like the most logical choices here. Approval based on an Authority Matrix with a Decision Tree or Decision Table rule would allow for complex approval workflows based on the purchase request amount.
upvoted 0 times
Brock
5 months ago
B) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Table rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
5 months ago
A) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Tree rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joesph
5 months ago
I think option A and B are the best approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel