Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPSA88V1 Topic 2 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 2
[All PEGACPSA88V1 Questions]

A business architect has developed a new process for a case type. To verify that the Ul elements collect the expected results, you want to test the process and the fields. Which two configurations, when used together, allow you to record a set of interactions and save the test results to verify process functionality? (Choose two.)

Available Choices (select all choices that are correct!

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Donte
2 hours ago
I'm not sure about C, but I think B is also a good option for testing the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
2 hours ago
Haha, unit tests for a case type? That's like trying to test a car by taking it apart. Definitely A and C are the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
3 days ago
I agree with Renea, creating a scenario test and adding explicit assertions on the Ul elements make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
4 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about D. Asserting on the Scenario testing landing page doesn't seem relevant to testing the process and fields. I'd go with A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 days ago
I think the correct answers are A and C. By creating a scenario test for the case type, we can record a set of interactions and verify the process functionality. And adding explicit assertions on the UI elements will help us ensure that the expected results are collected.
upvoted 0 times
Wilson
3 hours ago
I agree, creating a scenario test for the case type is important to record interactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renea
12 days ago
I think A and C are the correct choices.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel