Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPSA88V1 Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 1
[All PEGACPSA88V1 Questions]

Users create Insurance Coverage Request Cases to authorize insurance payments. Users

enter information that includes the name of the patient, the date of the procedure and the type of the procedure. After entering the information, user submits the request for a review of the patient's insurance policy. Because multiple users enter requests, duplicate request can occur. A request is considered a duplicate if the patient name, procedure type, procedure date match an existing request. You have been given two requirements:

- Ensure that users can identify duplicate requests.

- If a case is duplicate, it is not written to the database. Otherwise, write the case to the database.

Which two options configure application so that users can identify duplicate requests? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Barbra
7 days ago
Duplicate requests, huh? Sounds like a job for the Duplicate Busters! *dons superhero cape*
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
8 days ago
This question is a real head-scratcher, isn't it? I bet the answer is hidden in some obscure manual somewhere. Time to break out the magnifying glass!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
12 days ago
Ah, the old 'validate rule' trick, eh? Option D could work, but it might not be as robust as the other options. Gotta keep those duplicate requests at bay!
upvoted 0 times
...
Viki
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about option C. Configuring weighted conditions sounds a bit complex. I'd stick with the more straightforward options.
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
16 days ago
Yeah, let's stick with adding a duplicate search step and configuring a decision table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
27 days ago
I agree, option C does sound a bit complicated. Let's go with the simpler options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luann
1 months ago
I'm not sure about option C and D. I think they might not be as effective in identifying duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
1 months ago
I agree with Naomi. Adding a duplicate search step and decision table will help identify duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
1 months ago
Whoa, hold on there! Option A is the way to go, for sure. Adding a duplicate search step to the case life cycle design is the most comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
20 days ago
Maybe we can combine both Option A and Option B for a more thorough approach to identifying duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
23 days ago
I see your point, but I still think Option A is more reliable for catching duplicate requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
27 days ago
I think Option B could also be helpful in this situation, by using a decision table to check for duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
1 months ago
I agree, Option A is definitely the best choice for identifying duplicate requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Naomi
2 months ago
I think option A and B are the correct ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
2 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Configuring a duplicate search decision table and adding it to a Decision shape seems like the most straightforward and efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
29 days ago
Configuring a duplicate search decision table can really help improve the overall efficiency of the insurance coverage request process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 months ago
It's important to have a clear and organized method for identifying duplicate requests to avoid any confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
1 months ago
Adding a duplicate search decision table to a Decision shape would definitely help streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most efficient way to identify duplicate requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel