Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPDC88V1 Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPDC88V1 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 4
[All PEGACPDC88V1 Questions]

To access a property from an unconnected component, you use the

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Aggregation components are used to perform calculations on a list of actions, such as sum, average, count, minimum, or maximum. For example, you can use an aggregation component to calculate the total value of all the actions in a group. Verified Reference:Pega Academy - Decisioning Consultant - Aggregating actions


by Dominque at Feb 10, 2024, 12:02 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPDC88V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/500 words
Submit Cancel
Jacinta
5 days ago
I thought it was customer-dot-property?
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
11 days ago
It's definitely the component-dot-property construct!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
17 days ago
I’m leaning towards the component-dot-property option, but I could be mixing it up with another concept we covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
22 days ago
I feel like the customer-dot-property construct might be relevant, but it seems more like a connected component thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
28 days ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think the answer was related to how we access properties in different contexts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
1 month ago
I think it's the component-dot-property construct, but I'm not entirely sure if that's for unconnected components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
1 month ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is A, the "customer-dot-property" construct. That's the standard way to access properties from unconnected components, right? I'll double-check, but I think I've got this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
1 month ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is that the components are unconnected, so we can't use a direct property access. The answer has to be either A or C, since those involve some kind of construct to access the property.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
1 month ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know there are different ways to access properties, but I'm not totally clear on the specifics for unconnected components. I'll have to think it through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
1 month ago
This seems like a straightforward question about accessing properties from unconnected components. I'll carefully review the options and think through the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
1 month ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. I know IDM has different ways of organizing and storing documents, but I can't quite remember the specific terminology they use. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
1 month ago
I struggle remembering the details on certificates. D seems reasonable, but I feel like C might be the better option since it mentions server certs more explicitly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
1 month ago
Ugh, I hate these Azure security questions. They always seem to have multiple similar-sounding options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
6 months ago
Haha, the property value? What is this, the 90s? We're talking about modern web development here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Shaunna
5 months ago
Haha, the property value? What is this, the 90s? We're talking about modern web development here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
5 months ago
C) component-dot-property construct
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
5 months ago
A) customer-dot-property construct
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martha
7 months ago
The dot-property value directly? That can't be right, we need to go through the component to access properties from an unconnected component.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
5 months ago
Exactly, that's the proper way to access properties from an unconnected component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnathon
5 months ago
So, the correct answer would be C) component-dot-property construct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
6 months ago
Yes, that's correct. Using the dot-property value directly won't work in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
6 months ago
I think you're right, we should use the component-dot-property construct to access properties from an unconnected component.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Albina
7 months ago
Hmm, I thought we used the customer-dot-property construct for that. Let me double-check the docs on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Susana
6 months ago
I think the customer-dot-property construct is used for something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
6 months ago
I always use the component-dot-property construct to access properties from unconnected components.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glen
7 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be A) customer-dot-property construct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
7 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's the component-dot-property construct. That's how we access properties across components, right?
upvoted 0 times
Taryn
6 months ago
Absolutely, the component-dot-property construct is the way to go when you need to access properties from unconnected components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
6 months ago
I agree, using the component-dot-property construct is the standard way to access properties from unconnected components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
6 months ago
It's definitely the component-dot-property construct. That's the way to go for accessing properties across components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
7 months ago
Yes, you're correct. We use the component-dot-property construct to access properties from unconnected components.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daren
7 months ago
I agree with Erasmo, because you need to reference the component to access its property.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
7 months ago
I think the answer is C) component-dot-property construct.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel