Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB Exam ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Topic 6 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 6
[All ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Questions]

ABC is a fast food shop that receives orders by phone or the internet. The normal menu includes 15 different types of hamburgers; however, in the

last two days, due to a shortage of a special type of meat, they can only prepare six of the 15 varieties.

You are performing a third-party audit of ABC; you observed that the menu offering food on the website is still the normal one, with 15 different

hamburgers. During a 30-minute period, you observed several customers reluctantly accepting other than the hamburger they preferred. You decided

to raise the following nonconformity as follows:

"There is evidence that ABC has not reviewed the ability to provide customers the offered products".

The restaurant manager does not accept the nonconformity. She says that ABC had an extensive training programme for all personnel, which you have already seen when auditing Human Resources. This shortage of some hamburgers cannot be considered a management system failure.

Which one would be your answer from the following options?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The appropriate response in this situation would be:

C . I will raise it as a minor nonconformity; you have the option to appeal to our Certification Body.

This response acknowledges the restaurant manager's point that the shortage of some hamburgers may not constitute a management system failure. However, the fact remains that the menu was not updated to reflect the current availability of products, which led to customer dissatisfaction. This is a deviation from the ISO 9001 standard, which requires that the organization ensures the availability of resources needed to provide products and services as promised1. Raising it as a minor nonconformity allows the organization to address the issue within a specified timeframe and provides an opportunity for appeal if the organization disagrees with the auditor's decision2.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Vannessa
1 days ago
This is a tough one. I can see both sides here. But I think the best option is C. It's a minor nonconformity, and the restaurant should have a chance to address it. Plus, I heard the certification body loves a good burger, so they might cut them some slack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
6 days ago
Haha, looks like the fast food joint is running out of its signature burgers. That's like a burger joint without any burgers - what's the point, am I right? Anyway, I'd go with D. It's not a system failure, so a recommendation is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
7 days ago
I don't know, man. This is a tricky one. The restaurant manager seems to have a point about the training program. But the customers were clearly unhappy. I'd go with B just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
9 days ago
I think the correct answer here is C. It's a minor nonconformity, and the restaurant manager should have the option to appeal if they disagree. We need to give them a chance to address the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
11 days ago
I disagree with Quentin. I believe option A is more appropriate. Let's see what the Certification Body thinks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
13 days ago
I think option B is the best choice. It's a major nonconformity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel