Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB Exam ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 2
[All ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer Questions]

Scenario:

Headquartered in Sri Lanka, Operons Inc. is a freight forwarding company that adopted a BCMS aligned with ISO 22301. Prior to the certification audit, Operons Inc. measured gaps between their BCMS and the standard's requirements to ensure compliance. The certification body was contracted to conduct the audit, and a biased auditor from a previous ISO 9001 audit was replaced upon request. During the audit, two minor nonconformities were identified, and the audit team issued a recommendation for certification.

Based on Scenario 8, considering that these are only minor nonconformities and the top management was quick to acknowledge the oversight, the audit team issued a recommendation for certification. Is this acceptable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tegan
4 days ago
I disagree. A recommendation for certification conditional upon filing of corrective actions should have been issued.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
8 days ago
I think the correct answer is C. Even with minor non-conformities, the organization has demonstrated a strong commitment to compliance and should be awarded the certification. It's important to encourage and support these efforts, not penalize them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
13 days ago
I think a recommendation for certification should be issued even in cases of minor nonconformities.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel