Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 Topic 2 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 2
[All PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 Questions]

What can a firewall use to automatically update Security policies with new IP address information for a virtual machine (VM) when it has moved from host-A to host-B because host-A is down or undergoing periodic maintenance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When a virtual machine moves between hosts and its IP address changes (or if it's assigned a new IP from a pool), traditional static security policies become ineffective. Dynamic Address Groups solve this problem.

A . Dynamic Address Groups: These groups automatically update their membership based on criteria such as tags, VM names, or other dynamic attributes. When a VM moves and its IP address changes, the Dynamic Address Group automatically updates its membership, ensuring that security policies remain effective without manual intervention. This is the correct solution for this scenario.

B . Dynamic User Groups: These groups are based on user identity and are used for user-based policy enforcement, not for tracking IP addresses of VMs.

C . Dynamic Host Groups: This is not a standard Palo Alto Networks term.

D . Dynamic IP Groups: While the concept sounds similar, the official Palo Alto Networks terminology is 'Dynamic Address Groups.' They achieve the functionality described in the question.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Nina
18 days ago
Dynamic Address Groups, all the way! You know what they say, 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it.' And this option seems to be the least 'broke' of the bunch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
20 days ago
Wait, what? I thought this was a question about how to keep my virtual pet safe from hackers. Clearly, I'm in the wrong exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
20 days ago
Dynamic IP Groups sounds like the right choice to me. I mean, who doesn't love a good IP group these days? It's the future, man!
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
1 days ago
A) Dynamic Address Groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
3 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It makes sense for updating security policies with new IP address information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
6 days ago
User 1: I think Dynamic IP Groups is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalie
1 months ago
I'm going with Dynamic Host Groups. The firewall should be able to track the VM's movement and update the policies accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
Magdalene
3 days ago
C) Dynamic Host Groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
20 days ago
A) Dynamic Address Groups
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marguerita
1 months ago
Dynamic Address Groups, definitely! The firewall needs to be able to automatically update the security policies as the VM moves between hosts. This is the perfect solution.
upvoted 0 times
Deangelo
3 days ago
Dynamic User Groups wouldn't work in this scenario, it has to be Dynamic Address Groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
25 days ago
I agree, it's important for the firewall to stay up-to-date with VM movements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
26 days ago
Dynamic Address Groups is the way to go for automatic updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rickie
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but Dynamic Host Groups could also be a possibility for updating security policies automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
1 months ago
I agree with Nickole, Dynamic Address Groups make sense for updating IP address information automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
1 months ago
I think the firewall can use Dynamic Address Groups for that.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel