Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-StrataDC Topic 4 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-StrataDC exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 4
[All PSE-StrataDC Questions]

A single VM runs a web server and a DNS server A separate VM needs to access the DNS server, but is not allowed to access the web server What network control functionality is necessary to enforce this security posture'?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Raylene
21 days ago
Seriously, who even needs a web server these days? Just run everything on the DNS server and call it a day. Problem solved! (But in all seriousness, I think B is the right answer.)
upvoted 0 times
Karol
6 days ago
I agree, running everything on the DNS server would simplify things.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Van
22 days ago
I'd say B is the correct answer. Either a port filter firewall or a Palo Alto NGFW would work, but why go for the fancy option when the simple one will do the job?
upvoted 0 times
Vashti
12 days ago
Yeah, keeping it simple with a port filter firewall makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
14 days ago
I think so too, no need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
15 days ago
I agree, B seems like the most practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilson
30 days ago
Option B, for sure. Why spend more on a Palo Alto NGFW when a good old-fashioned port filter firewall can do the trick? Gotta watch that budget, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
1 months ago
I'm going with option C. A port filter firewall is the right tool for the job here, and I don't think the Palo Alto NGFW is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
I think option B could also work, as it gives you more flexibility in choosing the firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
7 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the most appropriate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
1 months ago
I see your point, but I think option C might be the most cost-effective solution since a port filter firewall can also enforce the security posture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
1 months ago
Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. A port filter firewall should be able to handle this requirement just fine, and the Palo Alto Networks NGFW is overkill in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Nobuko
20 days ago
It's better to go with the simpler option of a port filter firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
22 days ago
Yeah, the Palo Alto Networks NGFW might be too much for just separating access to the web server and DNS server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
23 days ago
I think using a Palo Alto Networks NGFW might be too much for this specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
29 days ago
I think a port filter firewall would be sufficient for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
1 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
1 months ago
Yeah, a port filter firewall should be sufficient for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katheryn
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is also valid as it gives the flexibility to use either a Palo Alto Networks NGFW or a port filter firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because a Palo Alto Networks NGFW can provide the necessary network control functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel