Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Strata Topic 6 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 6
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

Which built-in feature of PAN-OS allows the NGFW administrator to create a policy that provides autoremediation for anomalous user behavior and malicious activity while maintaining user visibility?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Michel at Sep 06, 2024, 06:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Strata Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lili
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) tagging groups could also be a good option for maintaining user visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
2 months ago
I'm just picturing the NGFW admin sitting at their desk, sipping their coffee and watching the autoremediation magic happen. Living the dream, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Kati
1 months ago
D) dynamic address groups (DAGs)
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
1 months ago
C) remote device User-ID groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
1 months ago
B) tagging groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colene
3 months ago
Dynamic user groups (DUGS) - sounds like the perfect feature for catching those pesky hackers in the act! Time to put on my cybersecurity superhero cape.
upvoted 0 times
Zack
2 months ago
Dynamic address groups (DAGs) are great for maintaining visibility while preventing malicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
2 months ago
I think tagging groups could also be useful for tracking user behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
2 months ago
I agree, Dynamic user groups (DUGS) are a game-changer for security!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrett
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) remote device User-ID groups. It provides better control over user behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS). It allows for autoremediation and user visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
3 months ago
I'm going with Dynamic user groups (DUGS) - it just makes the most sense for the features described in the question. Plus, it's a feature I'm familiar with from my NGFW training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
3 months ago
Dynamic address groups (DAGs)? Nah, that's more for IP addresses, not user behavior. This is a toughie!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
3 months ago
Remote device User-ID groups? I don't know, that doesn't really sound like it would cover autoremediation. I'm stumped on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Theola
2 months ago
B) tagging groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
3 months ago
A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Domonique
3 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking tagging groups might be the answer. That could help with user visibility and policy management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
3 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's Dynamic user groups (DUGS). That sounds like the feature that can handle user behavior monitoring and remediation.
upvoted 0 times
Helaine
3 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's definitely a useful feature for monitoring and remediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
3 months ago
I think you're right, Dynamic user groups (DUGS) does sound like the feature for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel