Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Strata Topic 3 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam

Question #: 101
Topic #: 3

Which built-in feature of PAN-OS allows the NGFW administrator to create a policy that provides autoremediation for anomalous user behavior and malicious activity while maintaining user visibility?

ADynamic user groups (DUGS)

Btagging groups

Cremote device User-ID groups

Ddynamic address groups (DAGs)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Hoa at Dec 11, 2024, 01:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Strata Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Sena

2 months ago

Hmm, this question is making my head spin like a top. Maybe I'll just spin the wheel and see what happens!

upvoted 0 times

Keena

1 months ago

C) remote device User-ID groups

upvoted 0 times

...

Willow

1 months ago

B) tagging groups

upvoted 0 times

...

Verlene

1 months ago

A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS)

upvoted 0 times

...

Craig

2 months ago

I think B) tagging groups could also be a good choice for maintaining user visibility and autoremediation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lennie

2 months ago

Dynamic address groups (DAGs)? What is this, a bag of alphabet soup? I'm sticking with DUGS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maricela

2 months ago

Remote device User-ID groups? Doesn't that just sound like a mouthful? I'm going with option A.

upvoted 0 times

Linette

16 days ago

Let's go with option A then, Dynamic user groups for autoremediation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earleen

19 days ago

Dynamic user groups would definitely help with maintaining user visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebbeca

1 months ago

I think option A, Dynamic user groups, is the best choice for autoremediation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

1 months ago

I agree, Remote device User-ID groups does sound like a mouthful.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sue

2 months ago

That's a good point, but I still think DUGS is the best option for autoremediation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C) remote device User-ID groups. It makes more sense for maintaining user visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sue

2 months ago

I think the answer is A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS). It allows for autoremediation and user visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reena

2 months ago

Ooh, tagging groups - that's got to be the answer, right? Tagging is all the rage these days.

upvoted 0 times

Ula

1 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it's dynamic address groups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roosevelt

1 months ago

I think it might be tagging groups too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

1 months ago

D) dynamic address groups (DAGs)

upvoted 0 times

...

Pete

1 months ago

C) remote device User-ID groups

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

1 months ago

B) tagging groups

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

2 months ago

A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS)

upvoted 0 times

...

Yesenia

2 months ago

D) dynamic address groups (DAGs)

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

2 months ago

C) remote device User-ID groups

upvoted 0 times

...

Maynard

2 months ago

B) tagging groups

upvoted 0 times

...

Rickie

2 months ago

A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS)

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleta

3 months ago

Dynamic user groups (DUGS) sounds like the way to go! Keeps things dynamic and responsive to user behavior.

upvoted 0 times

Lakeesha

2 months ago

Dynamic address groups (DAGs) could also be a good option for creating policies for user behavior.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

2 months ago

Remote device User-ID groups might be helpful for autoremediation of malicious activity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kelvin

2 months ago

I think tagging groups could also be useful for creating policies for anomalous user behavior.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ena

2 months ago

I agree, Dynamic user groups (DUGS) are great for maintaining user visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...