Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Strata Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

Which built-in feature of PAN-OS allows the NGFW administrator to create a policy that provides autoremediation for anomalous user behavior and malicious activity while maintaining user visibility?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nan
1 months ago
Dynamic user groups to the rescue! It's like having a superhero on your network, but without the cape and tights. Much more practical.
upvoted 0 times
Jeannetta
29 days ago
I agree, it's great to have that level of automation in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
1 months ago
Dynamic user groups are definitely a game changer for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sarina
2 months ago
I heard dynamic user groups are so powerful, they can even stop a hacker in their tracks. Or was that a super villain? Either way, got my vote!
upvoted 0 times
Christiane
20 days ago
D) dynamic address groups (DAGs)
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
28 days ago
C) remote device User-ID groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 months ago
B) tagging groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
1 months ago
A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitzie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) dynamic address groups (DAGs) could also be a valid option for autoremediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
2 months ago
Dynamic address groups (DAGs)? Really? That's for managing IP addresses, not user behavior. Clearly the answer is dynamic user groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
2 months ago
Remote device User-ID groups? Nah, that's not quite the right feature for this scenario. I'm going with dynamic user groups.
upvoted 0 times
Eve
8 days ago
Tagging groups may not provide the same level of autoremediation as dynamic user groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
9 days ago
What about tagging groups? Could that work as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
10 days ago
I agree, it allows for maintaining user visibility while addressing anomalous behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
1 months ago
I think dynamic user groups is the right choice for autoremediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) remote device User-ID groups. It makes more sense for maintaining user visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
2 months ago
Hmm, tagging groups could work too, but I'm not sure if they have the autoremediation feature. Dynamic user groups sound like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Hillary
1 months ago
Tagging groups might work, but dynamic user groups offer better visibility and control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
1 months ago
Dynamic user groups (DUGS) definitely provide autoremediation for anomalous user behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
2 months ago
I agree, tagging groups might not have the autoremediation feature we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
2 months ago
Dynamic user groups (DUGS) definitely provide autoremediation for anomalous user behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS). It allows for autoremediation and user visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
3 months ago
Dynamic user groups (DUGS) seem like the right choice here. They're designed to handle user behavior and malicious activity, right?
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
1 months ago
I agree, DUGS are perfect for handling user behavior and malicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
2 months ago
Yeah, DUGS allow for autoremediation of anomalous user behavior while maintaining visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
2 months ago
I think Dynamic user groups (DUGS) would be the best option for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel