Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Strata Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

Which built-in feature of PAN-OS allows the NGFW administrator to create a policy that provides autoremediation for anomalous user behavior and malicious activity while maintaining user visibility?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sarina
3 days ago
I heard dynamic user groups are so powerful, they can even stop a hacker in their tracks. Or was that a super villain? Either way, got my vote!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
3 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) dynamic address groups (DAGs) could also be a valid option for autoremediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
7 days ago
Dynamic address groups (DAGs)? Really? That's for managing IP addresses, not user behavior. Clearly the answer is dynamic user groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
12 days ago
Remote device User-ID groups? Nah, that's not quite the right feature for this scenario. I'm going with dynamic user groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
14 days ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) remote device User-ID groups. It makes more sense for maintaining user visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
20 days ago
Hmm, tagging groups could work too, but I'm not sure if they have the autoremediation feature. Dynamic user groups sound like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Magnolia
3 days ago
I agree, tagging groups might not have the autoremediation feature we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
4 days ago
Dynamic user groups (DUGS) definitely provide autoremediation for anomalous user behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
25 days ago
I think the answer is A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS). It allows for autoremediation and user visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
29 days ago
Dynamic user groups (DUGS) seem like the right choice here. They're designed to handle user behavior and malicious activity, right?
upvoted 0 times
Yuette
14 days ago
Yeah, DUGS allow for autoremediation of anomalous user behavior while maintaining visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
18 days ago
I think Dynamic user groups (DUGS) would be the best option for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel