Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-SoftwareFirewall Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-SoftwareFirewall exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 4
[All PSE-SoftwareFirewall Questions]

A customer in a VMware ESXi environment wants to add a VM-Series firewall and partition an existing group of virtual machines (VMs) in the same subnet into two groups. One group requires no additional security, but the second group requires substantially more security.

How can this partition be accomplished without editing the IP addresses or the default gateways of any of the guest VMs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Creating a New Virtual Switch:

By creating a new virtual switch, you can segment the network within the ESXi environment. The VM-Series firewall can then be used to provide security controls between these virtual switches using virtual wire mode.


Palo Alto Networks VM-Series Deployment Guide

Moving Guests to New Virtual Switch:

Guests requiring additional security are moved to the new virtual switch, allowing the VM-Series firewall to inspect and control traffic between the switches. This setup does not necessitate changes to the existing IP addresses or default gateways of the VMs.

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series Virtual Wire Mode

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hubert
21 days ago
You know, I'm just imagining the panic if someone accidentally deleted that default gateway in option C. That would be a real nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
Nickie
1 days ago
I agree, it's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to network configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
4 days ago
Option B sounds like the safest choice to avoid any accidental deletions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fletcher
22 days ago
C looks like a good way to leverage the existing hardware firewall. Keeping the IP settings the same is a nice bonus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
1 months ago
I'm not sure about option B. I think option D might also work if we configure the Layer 3 interface properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
1 months ago
Haha, editing all the IP addresses? That's a hard pass for me, option A is way too much work.
upvoted 0 times
Alpha
19 days ago
I think option B is a more efficient way to achieve the partition without changing IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
24 days ago
Agreed, option A sounds like a lot of manual work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlee
1 months ago
I agree with Anastacia. Option B seems like the most efficient way to achieve the partitioning we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
1 months ago
D is interesting, using proxy ARP to handle the partition without IP address changes. Definitely worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
2 months ago
Option B sounds like the way to go. Separating the virtual switches and using the VM-Series firewall to secure the more sensitive group is a clean solution.
upvoted 0 times
Tish
23 days ago
Phung: Exactly, it's a practical solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
26 days ago
It definitely simplifies the process and keeps everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
29 days ago
Agreed, it's a smart way to maintain security without changing IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
1 months ago
Option B sounds like the way to go. Separating the virtual switches and using the VM-Series firewall to secure the more sensitive group is a clean solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anastacia
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. It allows us to separate the VMs without changing their IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel