Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Platform Topic 3 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 3
[All PSE-Platform Questions]

A client chooses to not block uncategorized websites.

Which two additions should be made to help provide some protection? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Theodora at Sep 16, 2024, 06:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Platform Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Karan
3 months ago
This is a classic case of 'you gotta cover all your bases.' B and C are the obvious choices, but who knows what kind of crazy stuff could be hiding in those uncategorized websites, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Aleisha
2 months ago
User 3: Good point. We need to cover all our bases to protect against any potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
3 months ago
Agreed. We should also add a URL filtering profile with the action set to continue for unknown URL categories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
3 months ago
We should definitely add a file blocking profile to reduce the risk of drive by downloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
4 months ago
But adding known URL categories and continuing for unknown categories can provide some protection against uncategorized websites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
4 months ago
Haha, I bet the client is regretting that choice now. B and C are the way to go, no doubt. Wouldn't want any nasty malware sneaking in, right?
upvoted 0 times
Brett
3 months ago
Chery: Absolutely, those extra layers of protection can make a big difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
3 months ago
Better to be safe than sorry, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
3 months ago
I agree, adding a file blocking profile and a URL filtering profile is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
3 months ago
Yeah, definitely should have blocked those uncategorized websites.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilma
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B and D are better choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
4 months ago
I think option A and C should be added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
4 months ago
Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards B and C as well, but D could be an interesting option too. Gotta protect against those drive-by downloads!
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
3 months ago
That's true, having a security policy rule with known URL categories and a data filtering profile for custom data patterns could provide extra security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
3 months ago
I see your point, but I think A and D might also be worth considering for additional protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
3 months ago
Agreed, having a file blocking profile and a URL filtering profile with continue action for unknown categories can help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
4 months ago
I think B and C would be the best options to add for some protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Otis
4 months ago
B and C definitely seem like the way to go. Blocking those uncategorized websites and having that URL filtering profile is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
Hildred
4 months ago
I agree, having a file blocking profile and a URL filtering profile will help reduce the risk of security threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
4 months ago
B and C are definitely important for providing some protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel