BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Endpoint Topic 2 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Endpoint exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 2
[All PSE-Endpoint Questions]

An Administrator has identified an EPM-triggered false positive and has used the Create Rule button from within the relevant entry in the Security Events > Preventions > Exploits tab. What is the result of the created rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Kandis at May 22, 2024, 08:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Endpoint Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Stephaine
5 months ago
Ah, the joys of security events and false positives. At least the 'Create Rule' button doesn't come with a 'Break Everything' option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
5 months ago
D is the right answer, but I can't help but wonder if the 'Create Rule' button is just a fancy way of saying 'Throw more rules at the problem until it goes away'.
upvoted 0 times
Alline
4 months ago
D) The new rule will include the EPM that raised the prevention, the process that triggered the prevention, the machine on which the prevention was triggered, and a descriptive name for the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
4 months ago
B) The new rule stops all EPM injection into processes on the machine on which the prevention was triggered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
4 months ago
D) The new rule will include the EPM that raised the prevention, the process that triggered the prevention, the machine on which the prevention was triggered, and a descriptive name for the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
4 months ago
B) The new rule stops all EPM injection into processes on the machine on which the prevention was triggered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
4 months ago
A) The new rule stops all EPM injection into the faulted process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
4 months ago
A) The new rule stops all EPM injection into the faulted process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leota
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if I'd want to exclude the entire endpoint from Traps protection. That seems a bit overkill, don't you think? D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
5 months ago
I was going to pick B, but then I realized that's just too broad. The rule should be more targeted, like D says.
upvoted 0 times
Evangelina
4 months ago
Yeah, D provides a more detailed and targeted approach to address the false positive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
4 months ago
I agree, D seems like the most specific and effective option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
4 months ago
D sounds like the most specific and effective choice for creating the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
4 months ago
Yeah, D provides more detailed information for the rule to be effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
5 months ago
I agree, it's important to have a descriptive name for the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
5 months ago
I agree, D seems like the most specific option to address the false positive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
5 months ago
I think D is the best option, it includes all the necessary details for the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dana
5 months ago
The correct answer is D. The new rule will include all the relevant details, making it easy to manage and understand the prevention event.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnta
5 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
5 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel