Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-DataCenter Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-DataCenter exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-DataCenter Questions]

A client has a sensitive application server in their data center and is particularly concerned about resource exhaustion because of distributed denial-of-service attacks.

How can the Palo Alto Networks NGFW be configured to specifically protect this server against resource exhaustion originating from multiple IP addresses (DDoS attack)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Precious
15 days ago
Hey, this is a tough one! I'm leaning towards option D, but I wonder if the Palo Alto NGFW can also perform some fancy ninja moves to deflect the DDoS attacks. Like, 'Palo Alto Chop!' or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
20 days ago
Option C looks interesting, but I'm not sure if QoS Profiles will be enough to handle a full-blown DDoS attack. Better to go with the DoS Protection Profile for a more robust solution.
upvoted 0 times
Dominga
1 days ago
User 2: I agree, QoS Profiles might not be enough to handle a full-blown DDoS attack. Better to go with a more robust solution like the DoS Protection Profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
7 days ago
User 2: Yeah, we should go with the DoS Protection Profile for better protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
9 days ago
User 1: I agree, QoS Profiles might not be enough for a DDoS attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
11 days ago
User 1: I think option D, adding a DoS Protection Profile with defined session count, would be the best choice for protecting against DDoS attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darrin
20 days ago
I'm not sure about option D, I think option A could also be useful in ensuring only legitimate traffic reaches the server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
25 days ago
I agree with Rima, option D with a defined session count would help prevent DDoS attacks effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
27 days ago
I think option D is the best choice because it specifically addresses resource exhaustion from multiple IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. The DoS Protection Profile with defined session count sounds like the perfect solution to protect against resource exhaustion from multiple IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
Jaclyn
8 days ago
Definitely, setting up a DoS Protection Profile will help ensure that the server can handle legitimate traffic while blocking malicious requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
16 days ago
It's important to have a defined session count to limit the number of connections to the server and prevent overload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
22 days ago
I agree, option D seems like the most effective way to prevent resource exhaustion from DDoS attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel