BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OutSystems Exam Architecture-Specialist-11 Topic 5 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for OutSystems's Architecture-Specialist-11 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 5
[All Architecture-Specialist-11 Questions]

What is NOT a best practice for Mobile Application Architecture: transactions & granularity?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Margot
30 days ago
Option B is the way to go, no doubt about it. Partial commits and retries? Sign me up! Though I do wonder if the developers had to sync their watches to get the timing right.
upvoted 0 times
Arletta
2 days ago
User 2: I agree, it's important to have that order and sync granularity for a smooth experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
18 days ago
Option B is definitely the best choice. Partial commits and retries are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Belen
1 months ago
Option A sounds like a recipe for disaster. Who wants an app that constantly syncs and drains the battery? Not me, that's for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
1 months ago
I agree with Suzi. Option B is the clear winner here. Maintaining order and granularity is crucial for a robust mobile app architecture.
upvoted 0 times
Thersa
19 hours ago
Having long synchronizations in a single transaction can lead to issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
2 days ago
I agree with Suzi. Option B is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
2 months ago
I believe ensuring order and sync granularity is key for mobile application architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
2 months ago
Option A is definitely not the best practice. Long synchronizations and offline scenarios do not mix well. Partial commits and incremental syncing are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Sharee
22 days ago
It's important to be prepared for constant interruptions in mobile app architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
29 days ago
Partial commits and incremental syncing are much more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
29 days ago
Partial commits and incremental syncing are much more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
1 months ago
I agree, long synchronizations can be a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
1 months ago
I agree, long synchronizations can be a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 months ago
Option A is definitely not the best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
2 months ago
Option A is definitely not the best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
2 months ago
I agree with Odette. It's better to sync incrementally by entity with partial commit for better UX.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
2 months ago
I think having long synchronizations in a single transaction is not a best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel