Exactly, I was thinking the same thing. This question is trying to trick us, but I'm confident A is the right answer. Unless, of course, the architects were 'abstractly challenged' when designing the system.
Definitely, a good architecture helps reduce costs by improving efficiency and maintainability. And it also helps support planning and risk mitigation, so B and C seem like the benefits here.
I agree with you there. A well-designed architecture should provide a clear separation of concerns and promote modularity, which is the opposite of poor service abstraction.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm pretty sure the correct answer is A) Poor service abstraction. A well-defined architecture should actually improve service abstraction, not make it poor.
Junita
11 months agoWendell
11 months agoTammara
11 months agoLaticia
11 months agoDick
10 months agoBernadine
10 months agoCraig
10 months agoCammy
10 months ago