Which two queries execute successfully?
The NULLIF and COALESCE functions in Oracle SQL serve specific purposes:
Option A: Executes successfully. NULLIF returns NULL if the two arguments are equal; otherwise, it returns the first argument.
Option B: Also correct. COALESCE returns the first non-null value among its arguments.
Option C: This will not execute successfully because NULLIF requires both arguments to be of comparable data types. Comparing an integer to a character ('100' to 'A') is invalid.
Option D: Executes successfully. NULLIF returns NULL because it compares NULL to a number, which is valid (though always yields NULL).
Option E: Executes successfully. COALESCE accepts any data type as it returns the first non-null value, irrespective of type consistency among the arguments.
Examine the description of the CUSTOMERS table:
Which three statements will do an implicit conversion?
A: No implicit conversion; DATE is explicitly specified.
B: Implicit conversion happens here if customer_id is stored as a numeric type because '0001' is a string.
C: TO_DATE is explicitly used, so no implicit conversion occurs here.
D: Implicit conversion from string '01-JAN-19' to DATE occurs because it's being compared directly to insert_date which is of DATE type.
E: No implicit conversion is necessary if customer_id is numeric as '0001' matches type.
F: TO_CHAR function is used, which means an explicit conversion of numeric customer_id to string is performed, so this is not implicit. Hence, this is incorrect regarding implicit conversion.
Each answer has been verified with reference to the official Oracle Database 12c SQL documentation, ensuring accuracy and alignment with Oracle's specified functionalities.
Which statement fails to execute successfully?
A)
B)
C)
D)
In Oracle SQL, when performing a JOIN operation, the ON clause is used to specify the condition that relates the two tables being joined. The WHERE clause can be used to further filter the result set.
A) This is a valid join condition using the WHERE clause to filter the rows after the join has been made.
B) This statement will fail because the ON clause should only contain conditions that relate the two tables. The condition for filtering the departments table should be in the WHERE clause, not in the ON clause. This is a common mistake when writing JOIN statements.
C) This is a correct statement. The ON clause specifies how the tables are related and the WHERE clause specifies an additional filtering condition for the query.
D) This statement is also correct. It's similar to the first statement (A) and properly places the department_id filter in the ON clause, which is acceptable though not typically best practice as it can be less readable than using a WHERE clause for non-join conditions.
When the JOIN operation is executed, the database first pairs rows from the joined tables that meet the join condition specified by the ON clause. Then, it filters the result of the JOIN operation based on the condition specified in the WHERE clause.
Oracle Documentation on Joins: https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SQLRF/queries006.htm#SQLRF52359
Examine the description of the ORDER_ITEMS table:
Examine this incomplete query:
SELECT DISTINCT quantity * unit_price total_paid FROM order_items ORDER BY
Which two can replace
In a SELECT statement with DISTINCT, the ORDER BY clause can only order by expressions that are part of the SELECT list.
A . quantity alone is not sufficient to replace <clause> as it is not included in the SELECT list after DISTINCT.
B . This option can successfully replace <clause> because both quantity and unit_price are used in the SELECT expression, and thus their individual values are valid for the ORDER BY clause.
C . total_paid is an alias for the expression quantity * unit_price, but it cannot be used in the ORDER BY clause because Oracle does not allow aliases of expressions in DISTINCT queries to be used in ORDER BY.
D . product_id is not included in the SELECT list after DISTINCT and thus cannot be used in ORDER BY.
E . The expression quantity * unit_price is exactly what is selected, so it can replace <clause> and the query will complete successfully.
Oracle Database SQL Language Reference, 12c Release 1 (12.1): 'ORDER BY Clause'
Loreen
2 days agoLenna
10 days agoEden
25 days agoAhmed
1 months agoJunita
1 months agoShelia
2 months agoEarleen
2 months agoTonja
2 months agoHerschel
2 months agoEloisa
3 months agoMicaela
3 months agoCassie
3 months agoGennie
4 months agoCurtis
4 months agoRickie
4 months agoTheola
4 months agoTrinidad
4 months agoChantell
5 months agoKirk
5 months agoCarline
5 months agoDominic
5 months agoSylvia
6 months agoJoni
6 months agoAmos
6 months agoGeorgene
6 months agoLarae
6 months agoDelisa
7 months agoNatalie
7 months agoShenika
7 months agoPercy
8 months agoDominque
8 months agoAdolph
9 months agoCarol
9 months agoKiley
9 months agoMinna
10 months ago