New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle 1Z0-1093-25 Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1093-25 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All 1Z0-1093-25 Questions]

When considering autoscaling for provisioned throughput in NoSQL Database Cloud Service, which metric is LEAST relevant for determining when to scale up the capacity units?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A . CPU utilization of the compute instances hosting the database:

Autoscaling in NoSQL Database Cloud Service primarily focuses on RCUs (Read Capacity Units) and WCUs (Write Capacity Units).

The objective is to dynamically adjust capacity based on query workload, not on CPU utilization.

Even if CPU usage is high, it might not necessarily indicate that the capacity units are inadequate.

Why the other options are more relevant:

B . Rejected read requests (RCUs): Direct indicator that read capacity is insufficient, requiring scaling.

C . Rejected write requests (WCUs): Indicates that the write throughput is inadequate, necessitating scaling.

D . Latency of read and write operations: Increased latency often points to under-provisioned throughput.


Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud Service Documentation: Autoscaling Throughput

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Casie
2 months ago
B and C are way more important for scaling decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
3 months ago
Wait, so CPU doesn't matter? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
3 months ago
I agree, CPU utilization doesn't directly impact throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
3 months ago
I thought latency would be less relevant too, but I guess not!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
3 months ago
A is definitely the least relevant metric here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
4 months ago
I have a feeling that CPU utilization doesn't directly impact throughput, so I might lean towards A as the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like latency could also be a factor in scaling decisions, so that might not be the least relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
4 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed rejected requests being key indicators for scaling, so maybe options A or D are less important?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
4 months ago
I think CPU utilization might be the least relevant since it's more about the database's read/write capacity, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
4 months ago
The question is asking for the LEAST relevant metric, so I'm going to eliminate the ones that are more directly tied to throughput capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review the concepts around autoscaling for NoSQL databases before I can confidently answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The number of rejected requests due to insufficient capacity units is the key metric here, not the latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
5 months ago
Hmm, CPU utilization doesn't seem directly relevant to scaling throughput. I'm leaning towards one of the request-related metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different metrics and how they relate to autoscaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
10 months ago
I bet the answer is option C. After all, who needs to write data when you can just make it up as you go along? That's the true spirit of the cloud, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
8 months ago
I agree, option D, latency of read and write operations, is also important to consider when deciding to scale up capacity units.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
9 months ago
I think the least relevant metric would be option A, CPU utilization. It's more about the read and write operations than the compute instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
9 months ago
Option C is actually very relevant for determining when to scale up capacity units. Writing data is a crucial operation in a database.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irma
10 months ago
Ah, the age-old question: which metric is the least relevant? I say we just throw a dart at the options and call it a day. That's how I usually approach these things.
upvoted 0 times
Jame
8 months ago
D) Latency of read and write operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
8 months ago
C) Number of rejected write requests due to insufficient WCUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
8 months ago
B) Number of rejected read requests due to insufficient RCUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
9 months ago
A) CPU utilization of the compute instances hosting the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonda
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with option B. I mean, who even reads these days? Writes are where it's at. Gotta keep those writes flowing!
upvoted 0 times
Adelina
9 months ago
User 3: Agreed, keeping the writes flowing is key. Option B it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, writes are definitely more important. Can't have those rejected write requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
9 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the way to go. Reads are so last season.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olive
10 months ago
I'd say option D is the least relevant. Latency? Who cares about that? As long as the data gets in and out, that's all that matters!
upvoted 0 times
Shawna
9 months ago
User 3: I still think latency is not as important as the other metrics. We should focus on throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
9 months ago
User 2: I agree with Louann. Latency can impact user experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
10 months ago
User 1: I think option D is actually important. Latency can affect performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thad
10 months ago
But if the CPU is not being fully utilized, why would we need to scale up?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe latency of read and write operations is the least relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
11 months ago
I think CPU utilization is the least relevant metric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
11 months ago
Option A seems like the obvious choice here. I mean, if the CPU is maxed out, that's a pretty clear sign that you need to scale up, right?
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
9 months ago
Latency can also be a crucial factor in determining when to scale up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
9 months ago
D) Latency of read and write operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
9 months ago
Yeah, the number of rejected write requests is also important to consider for scaling up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
9 months ago
C) Number of rejected write requests due to insufficient WCUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
9 months ago
I think the number of rejected read requests is a good indicator of when to scale up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
9 months ago
B) Number of rejected read requests due to insufficient RCUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
10 months ago
D) Latency of read and write operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
10 months ago
C) Number of rejected write requests due to insufficient WCUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
10 months ago
B) Number of rejected read requests due to insufficient RCUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
11 months ago
A) CPU utilization of the compute instances hosting the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel