Oracle Exam 1Z0-1066-24 Topic 6 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1066-24 exam

Question #: 1
Topic #: 6

Your buyers are very attentive in maintaining the approved supplier lists as needed. One of your planners regularly uses the portal to communicate with some of their key suppliers and has noticed that the publication process is taking a lot longer to complete because the business has grown. The planner is also complaining that the collaboration candidates' list is cluttered with items that are not yet required.

Which two steps should you take to address the planner's complaint?

AActivate a Supply Chain Collaboration setting to ignore zero forecast combinations.

BActivate the 'Ignore for Supplier Collaboration' item attribute.

CActivate a profile option called 'Publish Order Forecast Using Sourcing Rules'.

DDisable the decomposition and generate candidates' parameters in the Publish Order Forecast scheduled process.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

To improve performance and reduce unnecessary items in the collaboration candidates list, you can activate settings to ignore zero forecast combinations, which prevents items with no forecast from appearing in the candidates list. Additionally, activating the 'Ignore for Supplier Collaboration' attribute for specific items ensures that these are excluded from supplier collaboration processes, streamlining the list to relevant items only. These options help in managing supply collaboration settings efficiently and are verified in Oracle documentation on Supply Chain Collaboration and Publish Order Forecast processes

by Elise at Oct 21, 2024, 05:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-1066-24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Avery

5 months ago

Wait, so they're using a portal to communicate with suppliers? That's so high-tech! I'm still over here faxing purchase orders. But seriously, I agree with Heike - options B and C seem like the logical choices to address the planner's issues.

upvoted 0 times

Laura

3 months ago

Sounds good, those should make a difference in efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mickie

3 months ago

Let's go with options B and C to address the planner's complaint.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

4 months ago

Agreed, option C sounds like it would streamline the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelaide

4 months ago

I think option B would help clean up the cluttered list.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

5 months ago

Haha, this reminds me of the time our supply chain coordinator tried to automate the entire process. Needless to say, it didn't end well. Anyway, I think options B and C sound like the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catalina

5 months ago

Hmm, interesting. The planner is complaining about the cluttered collaboration candidates' list, so disabling the decomposition and generate candidates' parameters (option D) might be a good solution. But I'm not sure about that 'ignore zero forecast combinations' thing in option A.

upvoted 0 times

Kenneth

5 months ago

Let's try option D first and see if it improves the situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

5 months ago

I'm not sure about option A though, it might be worth looking into further.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

5 months ago

Yeah, disabling decomposition could help streamline the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marquetta

5 months ago

I think option D makes sense to clean up the cluttered list.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doyle

6 months ago

I agree with Leah. Option A might also be useful in speeding up the publication process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leah

6 months ago

I think option B could help declutter the collaboration candidates' list.

upvoted 0 times

...

Heike

6 months ago

This question seems to be about managing supplier collaboration and publication processes. I think options B and C could be the way to go, as they seem to address the main issues mentioned.

upvoted 0 times