Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Topic 2 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 2
[All OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Questions]

Choose the correct answer:

Consider the following diagram fragment:

What makes this fragment invalid?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: F

In the given UML package diagram fragment, various elements are listed with stereotypes indicating their nature (class, interface). Stereotypes are used in UML to extend the vocabulary of UML in order to create new kinds of building blocks. They are typically enclosed in guillemets ( ).

The last element, 'six', does not have a stereotype indicating whether it's a class, interface, or some other kind of element. This lack of a stereotype leads to ambiguity about the nature of 'six'. Therefore, the fragment is considered invalid due to this omission.

All the other options do not constitute an error in the UML fragment: A) A list of elements is allowed in a package body. B) Visibility is not required for every element, especially within package diagrams. C) Interfaces are allowed in packages. D) Private elements are allowed in a package. E) Protected elements are also allowed in a package.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

F . Element six is missing its stereotype.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Odette
3 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I'm gonna go with E. Protected elements in a package? That's like putting a lock on your front door and leaving the key under the mat!
upvoted 0 times
Gail
2 months ago
Yeah, that's a good point. I think I'll go with E too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
3 months ago
E) Protected elements are not allowed in a package.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
3 months ago
You know what they say, 'if it's not broke, don't fix it.' I'm going with A. A list of elements in a package body? That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
3 months ago
Nah, man, it's gotta be B. How can you have a class without a visibility? That's like having a superhero without a cape!
upvoted 0 times
Rory
2 months ago
I agree with you, it has to be B. Classone is missing a visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
3 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's D. Private elements are not allowed on the list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
3 months ago
I agree with you, it has to be B. Classone is missing a visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
3 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's F. Element six is missing its stereotype.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
3 months ago
No way, it's definitely E. Protected elements are not allowed in a package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
3 months ago
I think it's actually A. Lists of elements are not allowed in a package body.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
3 months ago
No way, it's definitely E. Protected elements are not allowed in a package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
3 months ago
I think it's actually C. Interfaces are not allowed in a package.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolland
4 months ago
Hmm, that's an interesting point. I'll have to reconsider my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is F) Element six is missing its stereotype.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) classone is missing a visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
4 months ago
Hmm, I think it's option C. An interface in a package body? That's a big no-no!
upvoted 0 times
Blondell
3 months ago
I'm going with option F. Element six needs its stereotype.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's option A. Lists of elements are not allowed in a package body.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
4 months ago
I think it's option C too. Interfaces shouldn't be in a package body.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel