Choose the correct answer:
What is true about a MOF 2.x Model?
A MOF (Meta Object Facility) 2.x Model is not always a valid UML (Unified Modeling Language) 2.x Model. The MOF 2.x and UML 2.x serve different purposes and have different scopes of application.While UML is a general-purpose modeling language used to define software systems, MOF is a language for defining metamodels, which can include UML itself1.
The MOF 2.x specification provides the basis for metamodel definition in OMG's (Object Management Group's) family of modeling languages, which includes UML.However, it is based on a simplification of UML 2's class modeling capabilities1.MOF is designed to be simpler, directly implementable, and provides a set of CORBA interfaces for manipulating meta objects2.In contrast, UML is used as a general-purpose modeling language with potentially many implementation targets2.
Therefore, a MOF 2.x Model can be a valid UML 2.x Model when certain limitations are observed, such as adhering to the simplified class modeling capabilities that MOF is based on.This means that while a MOF model can resemble a UML model in terms of visual representation, it is fundamentally a MOF model, and its validity as a UML model depends on the extent to which it conforms to the UML specifications
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Tegan
1 months agoCristy
20 days agoAudry
21 days agoMitsue
28 days agoMarvel
2 months agoRikki
2 months agoIvette
14 days agoSabra
16 days agoChun
18 days agoGabriele
1 months agoCathrine
2 months agoBobbye
2 months agoJuan
1 months agoMerrilee
1 months agoCurt
1 months agoSol
2 months agoEugene
2 months agoAbel
2 months agoStephaine
2 months agoElly
2 months ago