BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 4
[All OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Questions]

Choose the correct answer:

What is correct about the modeling of individual things with UML?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In UML, modeling individual things (such as instances) involves making statements about them. Here are the details for each option:

A . A UML Model can contain individual things (e.g. Instances) UML does not prescribe the level of detail to be used in the description.

This statement is partially correct. UML models can indeed contain individual things (instances), but the level of detail is not explicitly prescribed by UML. However, the statement does not cover the possibility of incomplete or imprecise information.

B . A UML Model can contain statements about individual things If a thing is an instance of a Classifier, these statements must be consistent (all mandatory Properties must be defined, all Constraints must be satisfied).

While it is true that a UML model can contain statements about individual things (instances), the requirement for consistency (mandatory properties and constraints) is not explicitly mentioned in UML. Therefore, this option is not entirely accurate.

C . A UML Model can contain statements about individual things These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, and abstract, but not wrong.

This statement is also partially correct. UML allows for incomplete, imprecise, and abstract statements about individual things. However, it does not guarantee that these statements cannot be wrong.

D . A UML Model can contain statements about individual things. These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, may turn out to be wrong, or even be asserted as counterfactual.

This option provides a more accurate representation. UML allows for statements about individual things that can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, and even potentially incorrect. It acknowledges the uncertainty and variability in modeling individual things.

E . A UML Model can only contain statements about sets of individual things (e.g. Classifiers).

This statement is incorrect. UML models can contain statements about both individual things (instances) and sets of things (classifiers).


UML 2.5.1 Specification

While the UML specification does not explicitly state the options, it provides the foundation for UML modeling principles and allows for flexibility in expressing statements about individual things.

Remember that UML is a modeling language, and its primary purpose is to capture and communicate information about systems and their components. The level of detail, precision, and correctness can vary based on the modeling context and the specific use case. Therefore, option D best reflects the UML approach to modeling individual things.

Please note that the information provided here is based on UML 2.5.1, and it's essential to consult the official UML specification for the most accurate and up-to-date details.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Norah
4 months ago
I'm going with option A. It says UML doesn't prescribe the level of detail, so I can model individual things however I want.
upvoted 0 times
Sena
3 months ago
Definitely, it helps in accurately representing the system we are designing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
3 months ago
I agree with both of you. It's important to have that freedom in modeling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
3 months ago
That's true. It gives us flexibility in how we describe instances in a UML model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
3 months ago
I think option A is correct. UML allows modeling individual things without prescribing the level of detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Makeda
4 months ago
I think D is correct because UML models can contain statements about individual things that may turn out to be wrong or even counterfactual.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
4 months ago
Why do you think D is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
4 months ago
Ha! Option E is clearly a trick question. Of course a UML model can contain statements about individual things, not just sets.
upvoted 0 times
Lorrine
3 months ago
Yes, a UML model can contain statements about individual things, not just sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
4 months ago
I agree, option E is definitely a trick question.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deangelo
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option D looks interesting, allowing for statements that may turn out to be wrong or even counterfactual. That seems more realistic to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
5 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. A UML model should contain statements about individual things that are consistent with the defined classifiers and constraints.
upvoted 0 times
Ashley
4 months ago
Yes, I think so too. It makes sense that statements about individual things should be consistent with the defined classifiers and constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
4 months ago
I agree, option B seems to be the most accurate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel