Choose the correct answer:
What is correct about the modeling of individual things with UML?
In UML, modeling individual things (such as instances) involves making statements about them. Here are the details for each option:
A . A UML Model can contain individual things (e.g. Instances) UML does not prescribe the level of detail to be used in the description.
This statement is partially correct. UML models can indeed contain individual things (instances), but the level of detail is not explicitly prescribed by UML. However, the statement does not cover the possibility of incomplete or imprecise information.
B . A UML Model can contain statements about individual things If a thing is an instance of a Classifier, these statements must be consistent (all mandatory Properties must be defined, all Constraints must be satisfied).
While it is true that a UML model can contain statements about individual things (instances), the requirement for consistency (mandatory properties and constraints) is not explicitly mentioned in UML. Therefore, this option is not entirely accurate.
C . A UML Model can contain statements about individual things These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, and abstract, but not wrong.
This statement is also partially correct. UML allows for incomplete, imprecise, and abstract statements about individual things. However, it does not guarantee that these statements cannot be wrong.
D . A UML Model can contain statements about individual things. These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, may turn out to be wrong, or even be asserted as counterfactual.
This option provides a more accurate representation. UML allows for statements about individual things that can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, and even potentially incorrect. It acknowledges the uncertainty and variability in modeling individual things.
E . A UML Model can only contain statements about sets of individual things (e.g. Classifiers).
This statement is incorrect. UML models can contain statements about both individual things (instances) and sets of things (classifiers).
UML 2.5.1 Specification
While the UML specification does not explicitly state the options, it provides the foundation for UML modeling principles and allows for flexibility in expressing statements about individual things.
Remember that UML is a modeling language, and its primary purpose is to capture and communicate information about systems and their components. The level of detail, precision, and correctness can vary based on the modeling context and the specific use case. Therefore, option D best reflects the UML approach to modeling individual things.
Please note that the information provided here is based on UML 2.5.1, and it's essential to consult the official UML specification for the most accurate and up-to-date details.
Lazaro
6 months agoYun
6 months agoMona
6 months agoNatalie
6 months agoLazaro
6 months agoDona
7 months ago